Exploring the Essential Word Lists for Engineering Education: Engaging the Vocabulary Profiling Approach (VPA)

Y. J. Ng, S. Chong, P. Ng, J. Yeow, Lilliati Ismail
{"title":"Exploring the Essential Word Lists for Engineering Education: Engaging the Vocabulary Profiling Approach (VPA)","authors":"Y. J. Ng, S. Chong, P. Ng, J. Yeow, Lilliati Ismail","doi":"10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678667","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Concerning English as second or foreign language users, it may be difficult to learn technical information such as engineering disciplines in English. Context understanding, or text comprehension, success is frequently correlated with the size of the learners' vocabulary and the amount to which the intended resources are lexically covered in terms of word families. In retrospect, the type of vocabulary they have or are taught matters more to these learners for efficient learning than the number of their vocabulary. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the necessary vocabulary types for engineering text comprehension, as determined by the percentage of lexical coverage in terms of strategically selected word lists. The vocabulary threshold for engineering materials comprehension was set at 95% coverage, which is believed to be sufficient for students to comprehend the texts. The study adopts and analyses three-word lists, computing the lexical coverage in which it fits the needed vocabulary threshold for engineering texts comprehension. The sample used for the cross-reference analysis was the materials from the latest 2021 industrial electronics magazine articles, published by IEEE Xplore. The adopted word lists fulfill the vocabulary threshold with less than 5000-word families involved, as compared to higher reported vocabulary size or demand needed to understand engineering texts at 95% coverage. Hence, teachers of English for Engineering Purposes (EEP) should prepare pedagogically to meet students' vocabulary requirements in terms of vocabulary word lists. Students are expected to utilise the Vocabulary Self-Collection Strategy (VSS) to learn the words from the suggested word lists.","PeriodicalId":186195,"journal":{"name":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE)","volume":"229 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology & Education (TALE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TALE52509.2021.9678667","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concerning English as second or foreign language users, it may be difficult to learn technical information such as engineering disciplines in English. Context understanding, or text comprehension, success is frequently correlated with the size of the learners' vocabulary and the amount to which the intended resources are lexically covered in terms of word families. In retrospect, the type of vocabulary they have or are taught matters more to these learners for efficient learning than the number of their vocabulary. The purpose of this study is to ascertain the necessary vocabulary types for engineering text comprehension, as determined by the percentage of lexical coverage in terms of strategically selected word lists. The vocabulary threshold for engineering materials comprehension was set at 95% coverage, which is believed to be sufficient for students to comprehend the texts. The study adopts and analyses three-word lists, computing the lexical coverage in which it fits the needed vocabulary threshold for engineering texts comprehension. The sample used for the cross-reference analysis was the materials from the latest 2021 industrial electronics magazine articles, published by IEEE Xplore. The adopted word lists fulfill the vocabulary threshold with less than 5000-word families involved, as compared to higher reported vocabulary size or demand needed to understand engineering texts at 95% coverage. Hence, teachers of English for Engineering Purposes (EEP) should prepare pedagogically to meet students' vocabulary requirements in terms of vocabulary word lists. Students are expected to utilise the Vocabulary Self-Collection Strategy (VSS) to learn the words from the suggested word lists.
探索工程教育的基本词汇表:运用词汇分析方法(VPA)
对于英语作为第二语言或外语使用者来说,用英语学习工程学科等技术信息可能会很困难。语境理解或文本理解的成功与否通常与学习者词汇量的大小以及词汇族所涵盖的预期资源的数量有关。回想起来,对于这些学习者来说,他们所拥有的或被教授的词汇的类型比他们的词汇量更重要。本研究的目的是确定工程文本理解所需的词汇类型,这是由词汇覆盖率百分比决定的。工程材料理解的词汇阈值设定为95%覆盖率,认为这足以让学生理解文本。本研究采用三词表进行分析,计算出符合工程文本理解所需词汇阈值的词汇覆盖范围。用于交叉参考分析的样本是来自IEEE Xplore发布的最新2021年工业电子杂志文章的材料。所采用的单词列表在涉及不到5000个单词族的情况下满足了词汇阈值,相比之下,更高的报告词汇量或理解95%覆盖率的工程文本所需的需求。因此,工程英语教师应在教学上做好准备,以满足学生在词汇表方面的词汇需求。学生应该使用词汇自我收集策略(VSS)从建议的单词列表中学习单词。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信