Penerapan Academic Controversy Dalam Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar

A. Hidayat
{"title":"Penerapan Academic Controversy Dalam Meningkatkan Aktivitas Belajar","authors":"A. Hidayat","doi":"10.15575/AL-AULAD.V2I1.4429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to find out student learning activities before applying the Academic Controversy method, then the learning process using the Academic Controversy method, and student learning activities after applying the Academic Controversy method on social studies subjects in each cycle. The method used in this study is Classroom Action Research (CAR) which consists of four stages repeatedly, namely planning, action, observation and reflection. The technique of collecting data was carried out through the evaluation instruments of the pro and contra debates then with observation sheets for student and teacher activities. Based on the results of the study, the percentage of student learning activities before being applied to the academic controversy (academic controversy) method was only 31.2% with the less active category, after the application of the academic controversy (academic controversy) method in the first cycle student learning activities increased to 62 % included in the category is quite active. And student learning activities continue to increase in the second cycle which is at a very active stage which is 86%. From these data it can be concluded that the application of the method of academic controversy (academic controversy) can increase learning activities.","PeriodicalId":360242,"journal":{"name":"al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Primary Education","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Primary Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15575/AL-AULAD.V2I1.4429","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to find out student learning activities before applying the Academic Controversy method, then the learning process using the Academic Controversy method, and student learning activities after applying the Academic Controversy method on social studies subjects in each cycle. The method used in this study is Classroom Action Research (CAR) which consists of four stages repeatedly, namely planning, action, observation and reflection. The technique of collecting data was carried out through the evaluation instruments of the pro and contra debates then with observation sheets for student and teacher activities. Based on the results of the study, the percentage of student learning activities before being applied to the academic controversy (academic controversy) method was only 31.2% with the less active category, after the application of the academic controversy (academic controversy) method in the first cycle student learning activities increased to 62 % included in the category is quite active. And student learning activities continue to increase in the second cycle which is at a very active stage which is 86%. From these data it can be concluded that the application of the method of academic controversy (academic controversy) can increase learning activities.
学术界控制应用于增加学习活动
本研究的目的是找出学生在应用学术争议法之前的学习活动,然后是使用学术争议法的学习过程,以及在每个周期中应用学术争议法对社会研究科目的学生学习活动。本研究使用的方法是课堂行动研究(CAR),它由四个阶段反复组成,即计划、行动、观察和反思。收集数据的技术是通过支持和反对辩论的评估工具以及学生和教师活动的观察表来进行的。从研究结果来看,在应用学术争议(academic controversy)方法之前的学生学习活动中,属于比较不活跃的类别的比例仅为31.2%,而应用学术争议(academic controversy)方法后的第一周期学生学习活动增加到62%,属于比较活跃的类别。学生的学习活动在第二个周期中继续增加这是一个非常活跃的阶段,占86%从这些数据可以得出结论,运用学术争论(academic controversy)的方法可以增加学习活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信