SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE ÇELİŞKİSİZ VE SINIRLANMAYAN BİR BETİMLEME İÇİN HERMENÖTİK FENOMENOLOJİ: YÖNTEMBİLİM VE “ORMAN YOLU”

Ahmet Araşan
{"title":"SOSYAL BİLİMLERDE ÇELİŞKİSİZ VE SINIRLANMAYAN BİR BETİMLEME İÇİN HERMENÖTİK FENOMENOLOJİ: YÖNTEMBİLİM VE “ORMAN YOLU”","authors":"Ahmet Araşan","doi":"10.18490/sosars.1014233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Founded by Husserl, the new “rigorous science” of phenomenology aims to describe “things” by intentionally reflecting on the experience of the phenomenon in the consciousness. This approach, which was accepted as a return to subjectivity, is widely used in the interpretive social sciences. However, this phenomenology has its own limitations and contradictions when applied in social sciences: the “bracketing” method is impossible to apply, it cannot capture the deeper meanings, it does not focus on social interaction, and it is also suitable for positivist approaches to be applied in interpretive studies. Do these problems mean competent descriptive social research is impossible? First Heidegger and then Gadamer developed hermeneutical philosophies to overcome these issues of phenomenology and van Manen presented a methodology to allow the use of hermeneutic phenomenology to be used in the social sciences. The goal of the present study is to emphasize the problems of phenomenology while adapting it to social sciences. This work, after analyzing the problems of Husserlian description in the social sciences, will cover the basics of hermeneutical phenomenology and the methodology developed by van Manen to be able to reply to the question of “how” together with “what” and the Heideggerian “woodpath.”","PeriodicalId":240052,"journal":{"name":"Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18490/sosars.1014233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Founded by Husserl, the new “rigorous science” of phenomenology aims to describe “things” by intentionally reflecting on the experience of the phenomenon in the consciousness. This approach, which was accepted as a return to subjectivity, is widely used in the interpretive social sciences. However, this phenomenology has its own limitations and contradictions when applied in social sciences: the “bracketing” method is impossible to apply, it cannot capture the deeper meanings, it does not focus on social interaction, and it is also suitable for positivist approaches to be applied in interpretive studies. Do these problems mean competent descriptive social research is impossible? First Heidegger and then Gadamer developed hermeneutical philosophies to overcome these issues of phenomenology and van Manen presented a methodology to allow the use of hermeneutic phenomenology to be used in the social sciences. The goal of the present study is to emphasize the problems of phenomenology while adapting it to social sciences. This work, after analyzing the problems of Husserlian description in the social sciences, will cover the basics of hermeneutical phenomenology and the methodology developed by van Manen to be able to reply to the question of “how” together with “what” and the Heideggerian “woodpath.”
现象学这门新的“严谨科学”由胡塞尔创立,旨在通过有意识地反思现象在意识中的经验来描述“事物”。这种被认为是回归主体性的方法,在解释性社会科学中被广泛使用。然而,这种现象学在应用于社会科学时也有其自身的局限性和矛盾:“分门别类”的方法不可能适用,不能捕捉更深层的意义,不注重社会互动,也适合实证主义方法应用于解释性研究。这些问题是否意味着有能力的描述性社会研究是不可能的?首先是海德格尔,然后是伽达默尔发展了解释学哲学来克服现象学的这些问题,范·马南提出了一种方法论,允许在社会科学中使用解释学现象学。本研究的目的是强调现象学的问题,同时使其适应社会科学。在分析胡塞尔描述在社会科学中的问题之后,本书将涵盖解释学现象学的基础知识和范·马南发展的方法论,以便能够回答“如何”与“是什么”以及海德格尔的“林道”问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信