Probabilistic Information Processing Systems: Design and Evaluation

W. Edwards, L. Phillips, W. Hays, B. C. Goodman
{"title":"Probabilistic Information Processing Systems: Design and Evaluation","authors":"W. Edwards, L. Phillips, W. Hays, B. C. Goodman","doi":"10.1109/TSSC.1968.300119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Probabilistic Information Processing System (PIP) uses men and machines in a novel way to perform diagnostic information processing. Men estimate likelihood ratios for each datum and each pair of hypotheses under consideration or a sufficient subset of these pairs. A computer aggregates these estimates by means of Bayes' theorem of probability theory into a posterior distribution that reflects the impact of all available data on all hypotheses being considered. Such a system circumvents human conservatism in information processing, the inability of men to aggregate information in such a way as to modify their opinions as much as the available data justify. It also fragments the job of evaluating diagnostic information into small separable tasks. The posterior distributions that are a PIP's output may be used as a guide to human decision making or may be combined with a payoff matrix to make decisions by means of the principle of maximizing expected value. A large simulation-type experiment compared a PIP with three other information processing systems in a simulated strategic war setting of the 1970's. The difference between PIP and its competitors was that in PIP the information was aggregated by computer, while in the other three systems, the operators aggregated the information in their heads. PIP processed the information dramatically more efficiently than did any competitor. Data that would lead PIP to give 99:1 odds in favor of a hypothesis led the next best system to give 4?: 1 odds.","PeriodicalId":120916,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern.","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1968-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSC.1968.300119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

Abstract

A Probabilistic Information Processing System (PIP) uses men and machines in a novel way to perform diagnostic information processing. Men estimate likelihood ratios for each datum and each pair of hypotheses under consideration or a sufficient subset of these pairs. A computer aggregates these estimates by means of Bayes' theorem of probability theory into a posterior distribution that reflects the impact of all available data on all hypotheses being considered. Such a system circumvents human conservatism in information processing, the inability of men to aggregate information in such a way as to modify their opinions as much as the available data justify. It also fragments the job of evaluating diagnostic information into small separable tasks. The posterior distributions that are a PIP's output may be used as a guide to human decision making or may be combined with a payoff matrix to make decisions by means of the principle of maximizing expected value. A large simulation-type experiment compared a PIP with three other information processing systems in a simulated strategic war setting of the 1970's. The difference between PIP and its competitors was that in PIP the information was aggregated by computer, while in the other three systems, the operators aggregated the information in their heads. PIP processed the information dramatically more efficiently than did any competitor. Data that would lead PIP to give 99:1 odds in favor of a hypothesis led the next best system to give 4?: 1 odds.
概率信息处理系统:设计与评估
概率信息处理系统(PIP)利用人和机器以一种新颖的方式进行诊断信息处理。男人们估计每个基准和每对假设的可能性比,或者这些假设对的足够子集。计算机通过贝叶斯概率论定理将这些估计汇总到一个后验分布中,该分布反映了所有可用数据对所考虑的所有假设的影响。这样的系统避开了人类在信息处理方面的保守主义,即人类无法以这样一种方式收集信息,从而尽可能多地根据现有数据修改自己的观点。它还将评估诊断信息的工作分解为可分离的小任务。作为PIP输出的后验分布可以作为人类决策的指导,也可以与收益矩阵结合,以期望值最大化原则进行决策。在20世纪70年代的模拟战略战争环境中,一项大型模拟实验将PIP与其他三种信息处理系统进行了比较。PIP与其竞争对手的不同之处在于,在PIP中,信息是由计算机汇总的,而在其他三个系统中,操作人员在他们的头脑中汇总信息。PIP处理信息的效率大大高于任何竞争对手。数据会导致PIP给出99:1的赔率来支持一个假设,而下一个最好的系统给出4?1个机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信