Industry acceptance of boundary scan

S. Hronik
{"title":"Industry acceptance of boundary scan","authors":"S. Hronik","doi":"10.1109/WESCON.1994.403545","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Boundary-scan has been a published standard since May 21, 1990. Since inception of the standard, several manufacturers have introduced boundary-scan methods and are actively building systems. In order to determine the success of boundary-scan in penetrating the marketplace, a survey was conducted which covered several key points. The survey was designed to determine the need for a test method like boundary-scan, to determine how well boundary-scan meets those needs, and to make projections on how well boundary-scan will develop in the future. Thirty three engineers were polled in the survey, with each representing a different company in the United States or Canada. All respondents were active in design work, component qualification, or system testing. While the sample size was small, trends were observed which indicated validity of the data. The results show that boundary-scan is entering segments of the testing arena, but acceptance is slow and not universal. The conditions examined include the following: 1) How important is system testing in the eyes of system manufacturers? Aspects of testing that were examined included success rates, cost of testing, and test methods used. 2) What are the testing needs of industry? How rapidly is the industry moving to fine pitch modules and components that are not easily tested with probing techniques? What are the failure mechanisms. 3) Does boundary-scan meet the testing needs? What are boundary scan shortcomings, cost issues, and testing effectiveness? 4) Is boundary-scan in the development plans of designers and test engineers?.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":136567,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of WESCON '94","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of WESCON '94","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/WESCON.1994.403545","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Boundary-scan has been a published standard since May 21, 1990. Since inception of the standard, several manufacturers have introduced boundary-scan methods and are actively building systems. In order to determine the success of boundary-scan in penetrating the marketplace, a survey was conducted which covered several key points. The survey was designed to determine the need for a test method like boundary-scan, to determine how well boundary-scan meets those needs, and to make projections on how well boundary-scan will develop in the future. Thirty three engineers were polled in the survey, with each representing a different company in the United States or Canada. All respondents were active in design work, component qualification, or system testing. While the sample size was small, trends were observed which indicated validity of the data. The results show that boundary-scan is entering segments of the testing arena, but acceptance is slow and not universal. The conditions examined include the following: 1) How important is system testing in the eyes of system manufacturers? Aspects of testing that were examined included success rates, cost of testing, and test methods used. 2) What are the testing needs of industry? How rapidly is the industry moving to fine pitch modules and components that are not easily tested with probing techniques? What are the failure mechanisms. 3) Does boundary-scan meet the testing needs? What are boundary scan shortcomings, cost issues, and testing effectiveness? 4) Is boundary-scan in the development plans of designers and test engineers?.<>
行业接受边界扫描
自1990年5月21日以来,边界扫描已成为一项公布的标准。自标准开始以来,一些制造商已经引入了边界扫描方法,并正在积极构建系统。为了确定边界扫描是否能成功打入市场,我们进行了一项涵盖几个关键点的调查。该调查旨在确定边界扫描等测试方法的需求,确定边界扫描在多大程度上满足这些需求,并预测边界扫描在未来的发展前景。共有33名工程师参加了此次调查,他们分别代表美国或加拿大的不同公司。所有被调查者都积极参与设计工作、组件鉴定或系统测试。虽然样本量很小,但观察到的趋势表明数据的有效性。结果表明,边界扫描技术正在进入测试领域,但接受速度缓慢且不普遍。考察的条件包括:1)系统测试在系统制造商眼中有多重要?检查的测试方面包括成功率、测试成本和使用的测试方法。2)行业的检测需求是什么?行业向不易用探测技术测试的精细间距模块和组件的转变速度有多快?失效机制是什么?3)边界扫描是否满足测试需求?边界扫描的缺点、成本问题和测试效率是什么?4)边界扫描是否在设计师和测试工程师的开发计划中?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信