The Karabakh Knot of Caucasian Politics

A. Krylov
{"title":"The Karabakh Knot of Caucasian Politics","authors":"A. Krylov","doi":"10.20542/2073-4786-2023-1-140-151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyses the Karabakh problem, the politics of the conflicting parties, Russia and other countries after the First Karabakh War (1992–1994). The focus is on the results of the Second Karabakh War (September 27 – November 10, 2020) and reasons for the maintenance of a high level of tension in the region. The author concludes that the situation is developing in the direction of a new military confrontation, and not on the path of a peaceful settlement. The desire of the conflicting parties to use the Russian factor exclusively in their own interests contradicts the position of the leadership of the Russian Federation, which strives to preserve its neutral position of the mediator who contributes to the resolution of the conflict through negotiations and the development of mutually acceptable solutions. In 2021–2022 numerous formal peacemaking initiatives of the USA and its allies did not lead to a reduction in tension, but allowed to block the process of a peaceful settlement under the mediation and auspices of Russia, to create prerequisites for the liquidation of the Russian military presence in Nagorno-Karabakh and in Armenia. Thus, the policy of the collective West increased the probability of new shocks and military conflicts in the South Caucasus.","PeriodicalId":114903,"journal":{"name":"Russia and New States of Eurasia","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russia and New States of Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20542/2073-4786-2023-1-140-151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article analyses the Karabakh problem, the politics of the conflicting parties, Russia and other countries after the First Karabakh War (1992–1994). The focus is on the results of the Second Karabakh War (September 27 – November 10, 2020) and reasons for the maintenance of a high level of tension in the region. The author concludes that the situation is developing in the direction of a new military confrontation, and not on the path of a peaceful settlement. The desire of the conflicting parties to use the Russian factor exclusively in their own interests contradicts the position of the leadership of the Russian Federation, which strives to preserve its neutral position of the mediator who contributes to the resolution of the conflict through negotiations and the development of mutually acceptable solutions. In 2021–2022 numerous formal peacemaking initiatives of the USA and its allies did not lead to a reduction in tension, but allowed to block the process of a peaceful settlement under the mediation and auspices of Russia, to create prerequisites for the liquidation of the Russian military presence in Nagorno-Karabakh and in Armenia. Thus, the policy of the collective West increased the probability of new shocks and military conflicts in the South Caucasus.
高加索政治的卡拉巴赫结
本文分析了第一次卡拉巴赫战争(1992-1994)后的卡拉巴赫问题、冲突各方的政治、俄罗斯和其他国家。会议的重点是第二次卡拉巴赫战争(2020年9月27日至11月10日)的结果以及该地区维持高度紧张局势的原因。发件人的结论是,局势正在朝着新的军事对抗的方向发展,而不是沿着和平解决的道路发展。冲突各方完全为了自己的利益而利用俄罗斯因素的愿望与俄罗斯联邦领导人的立场相矛盾,俄罗斯联邦领导人努力保持其调解人的中立立场,通过谈判和制定相互接受的解决办法来帮助解决冲突。在2021年至2022年期间,美国及其盟国的许多正式和平倡议并没有导致紧张局势的缓解,而是被允许阻止在俄罗斯调解和主持下和平解决的进程,为清算俄罗斯在纳戈尔诺-卡拉巴赫和亚美尼亚的军事存在创造先决条件。因此,西方的集体政策增加了南高加索地区发生新冲击和军事冲突的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信