Takaful

Siti Fatimah Azzahro
{"title":"Takaful","authors":"Siti Fatimah Azzahro","doi":"10.58968/isf.v2i1.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine sentiment towards Islamic insurance in the last 16 years, from 2006 to 2022. The method used is descriptive statistical analysis combined with meta-analysis and sentiment from secondary data in metadata from 100 journals taken from Dimension, then processed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SentiStrength software. The results of the sentiment analysis show that expert opinions on the development of Islamic insurance vary, with positive sentiments of 37%, negative sentiments of 34%, and neutral sentiments of 29%. Based on the results of the study, it was found that there had been researched on the topic of Islamic insurance in the scientific literature. From the results of this study, it can be seen that there are differences of opinion among some scholars regarding Islamic insurance with the results of the impact of Islamic insurance itself. So, there is a need for cooperation between scholars and Islamic insurance experts to determine the law of Islamic insurance itself. This is complemented by the dissemination of literacy regarding Islamic insurance and its impact on individuals and the country, to increase public awareness of the importance of choosing Islamic insurance by Islamic law to avoid sins and loss of property.","PeriodicalId":399105,"journal":{"name":"Islamic Social Finance","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Islamic Social Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58968/isf.v2i1.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to determine sentiment towards Islamic insurance in the last 16 years, from 2006 to 2022. The method used is descriptive statistical analysis combined with meta-analysis and sentiment from secondary data in metadata from 100 journals taken from Dimension, then processed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SentiStrength software. The results of the sentiment analysis show that expert opinions on the development of Islamic insurance vary, with positive sentiments of 37%, negative sentiments of 34%, and neutral sentiments of 29%. Based on the results of the study, it was found that there had been researched on the topic of Islamic insurance in the scientific literature. From the results of this study, it can be seen that there are differences of opinion among some scholars regarding Islamic insurance with the results of the impact of Islamic insurance itself. So, there is a need for cooperation between scholars and Islamic insurance experts to determine the law of Islamic insurance itself. This is complemented by the dissemination of literacy regarding Islamic insurance and its impact on individuals and the country, to increase public awareness of the importance of choosing Islamic insurance by Islamic law to avoid sins and loss of property.
本研究旨在确定从2006年到2022年的过去16年中对伊斯兰保险的看法。采用描述性统计分析结合元分析和情感分析的方法,对来自Dimension的100种期刊的元数据中的次要数据进行分析,然后使用Microsoft Excel 2016和SentiStrength软件进行处理。情绪分析结果显示,专家对伊斯兰保险发展的看法各不相同,正面看法为37%,负面看法为34%,中性看法为29%。根据研究结果,发现在科学文献中已有对伊斯兰保险主题的研究。从本研究的结果可以看出,由于伊斯兰保险本身的影响,一些学者对伊斯兰保险的看法存在分歧。因此,需要学者和伊斯兰保险专家之间的合作来确定伊斯兰保险本身的法律。此外,还传播关于伊斯兰保险及其对个人和国家的影响的知识,以提高公众对根据伊斯兰法律选择伊斯兰保险以避免犯罪和财产损失的重要性的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信