use of Learning Strategy in Reading of Reflective Learners

Nabila Ayu Nisa
{"title":"use of Learning Strategy in Reading of Reflective Learners","authors":"Nabila Ayu Nisa","doi":"10.54012/jcell.v2i1.52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of this study was to see if there was a significant difference between the three types of reflective learners' reading learning strategies. The participants were 35 Senior High School students in Bandar Lampung, who were in the 12th grade. The Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) was used to categorize students into reflectivity/impulsivity, and the Language Learning Approach Questionnaire (LLSQ) was administered to determine students' learning strategy preferences. The data was analyzed using One Way ANOVA with a significance level of 0.05. The findings revealed that reflective learners' reading strategies differed significantly from those utilized by non-reflective learners. According to the finding, Reflective learners used more metacognitive reading methods that were related to their own prior experience and knowledge.","PeriodicalId":294669,"journal":{"name":"Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v2i1.52","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this study was to see if there was a significant difference between the three types of reflective learners' reading learning strategies. The participants were 35 Senior High School students in Bandar Lampung, who were in the 12th grade. The Matching Familiar Figure Test (MFFT) was used to categorize students into reflectivity/impulsivity, and the Language Learning Approach Questionnaire (LLSQ) was administered to determine students' learning strategy preferences. The data was analyzed using One Way ANOVA with a significance level of 0.05. The findings revealed that reflective learners' reading strategies differed significantly from those utilized by non-reflective learners. According to the finding, Reflective learners used more metacognitive reading methods that were related to their own prior experience and knowledge.
反思性学习者在阅读中的学习策略运用
本研究的目的是观察三种反思性学习者的阅读学习策略之间是否存在显著差异。参与者是南榜市的35名高中学生,他们是12年级的学生。采用匹配熟悉图测验(MFFT)将学生分为反思性和冲动性两类,采用语言学习方法问卷(LLSQ)测定学生的学习策略偏好。数据分析采用单因素方差分析,显著性水平为0.05。研究结果表明,反思性学习者的阅读策略与非反思性学习者的阅读策略存在显著差异。根据研究结果,反思性学习者更多地使用与他们自己先前的经验和知识相关的元认知阅读方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信