Stakeholder Perceptions of the Effects of a Public School-Based Theatre Program for Children with ASD

T. Goldstein, M. Lerner, Sarah J Paterson, L. Jaeggi, Tamara Spiewak Toub, K. Hirsh-Pasek, R. Golinkoff
{"title":"Stakeholder Perceptions of the Effects of a Public School-Based Theatre Program for Children with ASD","authors":"T. Goldstein, M. Lerner, Sarah J Paterson, L. Jaeggi, Tamara Spiewak Toub, K. Hirsh-Pasek, R. Golinkoff","doi":"10.21977/d915136948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Author(s): Goldstein, Thalia R.; Lerner, Matthew D; Paterson, Sarah; Jaeggi, Lena; Toub, Tamara Spiewak; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy; Golinkoff, Roberta | Abstract: Arts programs are often credited with helping children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) gain cognitive and social skills. As with all claims of transfer from experience in the arts to abilities in non-arts domains, empirical evidence is mixed, and often criticized for both imprecise methodologies and a lack of connection back to the art form itself. Exact measurement of programs’ mechanisms and effects are rare. To investigate the effect of theatre experiences for children with ASD, we completed a systematic study of adult stakeholders of a large, school-based, successful musical theatre program. We found stakeholders emphasized modeling, routines, and relaxation as useful strategies, endorsing that the program built imitation, motor abilities and turn-taking skills. These observations raise questions for standard theories of the effects of arts that focus and accentuate only higher order social and emotional or academic skills, and emphasize the importance of including stakeholders in theorizing and measuring the effects of arts programs for all populations.","PeriodicalId":126779,"journal":{"name":"Journal for Learning through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal for Learning through the Arts: A Research Journal on Arts Integration in Schools and Communities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21977/d915136948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Author(s): Goldstein, Thalia R.; Lerner, Matthew D; Paterson, Sarah; Jaeggi, Lena; Toub, Tamara Spiewak; Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy; Golinkoff, Roberta | Abstract: Arts programs are often credited with helping children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) gain cognitive and social skills. As with all claims of transfer from experience in the arts to abilities in non-arts domains, empirical evidence is mixed, and often criticized for both imprecise methodologies and a lack of connection back to the art form itself. Exact measurement of programs’ mechanisms and effects are rare. To investigate the effect of theatre experiences for children with ASD, we completed a systematic study of adult stakeholders of a large, school-based, successful musical theatre program. We found stakeholders emphasized modeling, routines, and relaxation as useful strategies, endorsing that the program built imitation, motor abilities and turn-taking skills. These observations raise questions for standard theories of the effects of arts that focus and accentuate only higher order social and emotional or academic skills, and emphasize the importance of including stakeholders in theorizing and measuring the effects of arts programs for all populations.
利益相关者对ASD儿童公立学校戏剧项目效果的看法
作者:Goldstein, Thalia R.;马修·D·勒纳;帕特森,萨拉;杰西,丽娜;塔玛拉·斯皮沃克;Hirsh-Pasek,凯西;摘要:艺术项目通常被认为有助于自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)儿童获得认知和社交技能。正如所有从艺术领域的经验到非艺术领域的能力转移的主张一样,经验证据是混合的,并且经常被批评为不精确的方法和缺乏与艺术形式本身的联系。对项目的机制和效果的精确测量是罕见的。为了调查戏剧体验对自闭症儿童的影响,我们完成了一项对大型学校音乐剧项目的成人利益相关者的系统研究。我们发现,利益相关者强调建模、常规和放松是有用的策略,认可该项目培养了模仿、运动能力和轮流技能。这些观察结果对艺术影响的标准理论提出了质疑,这些理论只关注和强调更高层次的社会、情感或学术技能,并强调了包括利益相关者在内的理论化和衡量艺术项目对所有人群的影响的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书