Understanding, Participation, and Obstacles of Elementary School Teachers in Improving Scientific Writing Skills

S. Marmoah, S. Istiyati, Hasan Mahfud, Hadiyah, Matsuri
{"title":"Understanding, Participation, and Obstacles of Elementary School Teachers in Improving Scientific Writing Skills","authors":"S. Marmoah, S. Istiyati, Hasan Mahfud, Hadiyah, Matsuri","doi":"10.1145/3452144.3453838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine teacher's understanding and participation in scientific writing and describe their obstacles in improving scientific writing skills. This study is qualitative. Study with a descriptive design. Public elementary school teachers in Laweyan District, Surakarta were the subjects of this study. The study was conducted from February to July 2020. Data collection techniques include interviews and documentation while data validity techniques include source triangulation. Qualitative descriptive analysis was employed through four stages of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that (1) the level of teacher's understanding of scientific writing is 40% (understand) and 60% (not understand); (2) the level of teacher's participation in scientific writing is 20% (often write scientific papers), 60% (rarely write scientific papers), and 20% (have never or never written scientific papers); and (3) factors that inhibit teacher's understanding and participation are internal (age, motivation, and lack of teacher insight and idea development) and external factors (lack of continuous training on scientific writing, school administrative tasks, and financial support). Therefore, this study can guide schools or education offices to improve the workings and programs of continuing professional development before taking into account the obstacles experienced by the teachers to provide appropriate facilities for them.","PeriodicalId":107308,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3453838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to determine teacher's understanding and participation in scientific writing and describe their obstacles in improving scientific writing skills. This study is qualitative. Study with a descriptive design. Public elementary school teachers in Laweyan District, Surakarta were the subjects of this study. The study was conducted from February to July 2020. Data collection techniques include interviews and documentation while data validity techniques include source triangulation. Qualitative descriptive analysis was employed through four stages of data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The results show that (1) the level of teacher's understanding of scientific writing is 40% (understand) and 60% (not understand); (2) the level of teacher's participation in scientific writing is 20% (often write scientific papers), 60% (rarely write scientific papers), and 20% (have never or never written scientific papers); and (3) factors that inhibit teacher's understanding and participation are internal (age, motivation, and lack of teacher insight and idea development) and external factors (lack of continuous training on scientific writing, school administrative tasks, and financial support). Therefore, this study can guide schools or education offices to improve the workings and programs of continuing professional development before taking into account the obstacles experienced by the teachers to provide appropriate facilities for them.
小学教师提高科学写作能力的理解、参与与障碍
本研究旨在确定教师对科学写作的理解和参与,并描述他们在提高科学写作技能方面的障碍。这项研究是定性的。采用描述性设计进行研究。本研究以泗水市腊尾区公立小学教师为研究对象。该研究于2020年2月至7月进行。数据收集技术包括访谈和文档,而数据有效性技术包括源三角测量。定性描述性分析通过数据收集、数据简化、数据呈现和结论绘制四个阶段进行。结果表明:(1)教师对科技写作的理解程度为40%(理解)和60%(不理解);(2)教师参与科技论文写作的水平为20%(经常写科技论文)、60%(很少写科技论文)、20%(从未或从未写过科技论文);(3)抑制教师理解和参与的因素有内部因素(年龄、动机、缺乏教师洞察力和思想发展)和外部因素(缺乏持续的科学写作培训、学校行政任务和财政支持)。因此,本研究可以指导学校或教育局在考虑教师所遇到的障碍,为他们提供适当的设施之前,改善持续专业发展的工作和计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信