Kontestasi antara Muslim Fundamentalis dan Muslim Liberal dalam Perebutan Makna Sosial Keagamaan di Indonesia

Nur Hidayat Wakhid Udin
{"title":"Kontestasi antara Muslim Fundamentalis dan Muslim Liberal dalam Perebutan Makna Sosial Keagamaan di Indonesia","authors":"Nur Hidayat Wakhid Udin","doi":"10.15642/teosofi.2018.8.1.164-186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Islam is a religion that highly respects and appreci-ates the values of humanity and puts strong emphasis on the creation of peace and harmony among humankind. It rejects and even condemns violent actions in any form with any means. However, the facts show us that ideological and political contestation, among the existed groups in Islam, often lead to open conflict, as can be observed in several cases. The article attempts to portray the contestation of Islamic Fundamentalist group and Islamic Liberal group in Indonesia. Although there have been many studies conducted and published on this issue, I see yet the importance of discussion about the issue. The significance could be observed in the fact that it is one of socio-religious problems faced by the Muslim community around the world, including Indonesia. Employing descriptive-qualitative approach the study stresses that different perspectives used and dissimilarly opposite interpretation produced by each group in understanding and interpreting the religious texts have resulted in massively deep but even hot contestation between the two groups. While the Islamic Fundamentalist group tends to see the holy texts in their narrow and rigid understanding, the Islamic Liberal one understands the texts loosely and, to a lesser extent, unrestrained.","PeriodicalId":174700,"journal":{"name":"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/teosofi.2018.8.1.164-186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Islam is a religion that highly respects and appreci-ates the values of humanity and puts strong emphasis on the creation of peace and harmony among humankind. It rejects and even condemns violent actions in any form with any means. However, the facts show us that ideological and political contestation, among the existed groups in Islam, often lead to open conflict, as can be observed in several cases. The article attempts to portray the contestation of Islamic Fundamentalist group and Islamic Liberal group in Indonesia. Although there have been many studies conducted and published on this issue, I see yet the importance of discussion about the issue. The significance could be observed in the fact that it is one of socio-religious problems faced by the Muslim community around the world, including Indonesia. Employing descriptive-qualitative approach the study stresses that different perspectives used and dissimilarly opposite interpretation produced by each group in understanding and interpreting the religious texts have resulted in massively deep but even hot contestation between the two groups. While the Islamic Fundamentalist group tends to see the holy texts in their narrow and rigid understanding, the Islamic Liberal one understands the texts loosely and, to a lesser extent, unrestrained.
原教旨主义穆斯林和自由穆斯林在印尼争取宗教意义
伊斯兰教是一个高度尊重和欣赏人类价值的宗教,非常强调在人类之间创造和平与和谐。它拒绝甚至谴责以任何形式、任何手段采取的暴力行动。然而,事实向我们表明,伊斯兰教现有集团之间的意识形态和政治争论往往导致公开冲突,在若干情况下可以观察到这一点。本文试图描绘印尼伊斯兰原教旨主义团体与伊斯兰自由主义团体之间的斗争。虽然关于这个问题已经进行了很多研究并发表了很多文章,但我仍然认为讨论这个问题很重要。它是包括印度尼西亚在内的全世界穆斯林社区所面临的社会宗教问题之一,可见其重要性。本研究采用描述定性的方法,强调在理解和解释宗教文本时,每一群体所使用的不同视角和不同的相反解释导致了两个群体之间大规模的深刻甚至激烈的争论。伊斯兰原教旨主义者倾向于用他们狭隘和僵化的理解来看待圣典,而伊斯兰自由主义者对圣典的理解较为松散,在较小程度上是不受约束的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信