Orientation Optimization in Additive Manufacturing: Evaluation of Recent Trends

Jannatul Bushra, Hannah D. Budinoff
{"title":"Orientation Optimization in Additive Manufacturing: Evaluation of Recent Trends","authors":"Jannatul Bushra, Hannah D. Budinoff","doi":"10.1115/detc2021-71958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Build orientation in additive manufacturing influences the mechanical properties, surface quality, build time, and cost of the product. Rather than relying on trial-and-error or prior experience, the choice of build orientation can be formulated as an optimization problem. Consequently, orientation optimization has been a popular research topic for several decades, with new optimization methods being proposed each year. However, despite the rapid pace of research in additive manufacturing, there has not been a critical comparison of different orientation optimization methods. In this study, we present a critical review of 50 articles published since 2015 that proposes a method for orientation optimization for additive manufacturing. We classify included papers by optimization methods used, AM process modeled, and objective functions considered. While the pace of research in recent years has been rapid, most approaches we identified utilized similar objective functions and computational optimization techniques to research from the early 2000s. The most common optimization method in the included research was exhaustive search. Most methods focused on broad applicability to all additive manufacturing processes, rather than a specific process, but a few works focused on powder bed fusion and material extrusion. We also identified several areas for future work including integration with other design and process planning tasks such as topology optimization, more focus on practical implementation with users, testing of computational efficiency, and experimental validation of utilized objective functions.","PeriodicalId":318534,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: 26th Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference (DFMLC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2021-71958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Build orientation in additive manufacturing influences the mechanical properties, surface quality, build time, and cost of the product. Rather than relying on trial-and-error or prior experience, the choice of build orientation can be formulated as an optimization problem. Consequently, orientation optimization has been a popular research topic for several decades, with new optimization methods being proposed each year. However, despite the rapid pace of research in additive manufacturing, there has not been a critical comparison of different orientation optimization methods. In this study, we present a critical review of 50 articles published since 2015 that proposes a method for orientation optimization for additive manufacturing. We classify included papers by optimization methods used, AM process modeled, and objective functions considered. While the pace of research in recent years has been rapid, most approaches we identified utilized similar objective functions and computational optimization techniques to research from the early 2000s. The most common optimization method in the included research was exhaustive search. Most methods focused on broad applicability to all additive manufacturing processes, rather than a specific process, but a few works focused on powder bed fusion and material extrusion. We also identified several areas for future work including integration with other design and process planning tasks such as topology optimization, more focus on practical implementation with users, testing of computational efficiency, and experimental validation of utilized objective functions.
增材制造中的定向优化:近期趋势的评价
增材制造中的构建方向影响产品的机械性能、表面质量、构建时间和成本。构建方向的选择可以表述为一个优化问题,而不是依赖于试错或先前的经验。因此,定向优化是几十年来的热门研究课题,每年都有新的优化方法被提出。然而,尽管增材制造的研究步伐很快,但还没有对不同的定向优化方法进行关键的比较。在本研究中,我们对自2015年以来发表的50篇文章进行了批判性回顾,这些文章提出了一种用于增材制造的定向优化方法。我们根据使用的优化方法,AM过程建模和考虑的目标函数对纳入的论文进行分类。虽然近年来的研究步伐很快,但我们确定的大多数方法都是利用类似的目标函数和计算优化技术进行研究的。在纳入的研究中,最常见的优化方法是穷举搜索。大多数方法侧重于广泛适用于所有增材制造工艺,而不是特定工艺,但少数工作侧重于粉末床熔融和材料挤压。我们还确定了未来工作的几个领域,包括与其他设计和工艺规划任务的集成,如拓扑优化,更多地关注与用户的实际实现,计算效率的测试,以及利用目标函数的实验验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信