Using Cooperative Discussion Questioning (Coop-Dis-Q) Strategy toward Narrative Reading to the Tenth Grade Students of MA Al-Fatah Palembang

Mirrah Salsabila, Kms Badaruddin, ST Zailia
{"title":"Using Cooperative Discussion Questioning (Coop-Dis-Q) Strategy toward Narrative Reading to the Tenth Grade Students of MA Al-Fatah Palembang","authors":"Mirrah Salsabila, Kms Badaruddin, ST Zailia","doi":"10.19109/literal.v1i1.12951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study were to find out whether or not there was a significant difference in reading comprehension achievement between the tenth grade students of MA Al-Fatah Palembang who are taught by using Coop-Dis-Q strategy and those who are not, and to find out whether or not there was a significant improvement before and after the treatments on students’ narrative reading comprehension achievement taught by using Coop-Dis-Q strategy at the tenth grade of MA Al-Fatah Palembang. The sample was 70 students. In collecting the data, the test was given twice to experimental and control groups, as a pretest and posttest. The data were analyzed by using independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test in SPSS 20 program. The finding showed that the p-output (sig.(2-tailed)) was 0.004 lower than 0.05 and the t-value 2.990 was higher than t-table 1.667. Therefore it could be stated that the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It means that narrative reading comprehension by using Coop-Dis-Q strategy had a significant improvement on the students’ reading comprehension achievement.","PeriodicalId":421540,"journal":{"name":"Literal: English Teaching and Learning Journal","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literal: English Teaching and Learning Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19109/literal.v1i1.12951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to find out whether or not there was a significant difference in reading comprehension achievement between the tenth grade students of MA Al-Fatah Palembang who are taught by using Coop-Dis-Q strategy and those who are not, and to find out whether or not there was a significant improvement before and after the treatments on students’ narrative reading comprehension achievement taught by using Coop-Dis-Q strategy at the tenth grade of MA Al-Fatah Palembang. The sample was 70 students. In collecting the data, the test was given twice to experimental and control groups, as a pretest and posttest. The data were analyzed by using independent sample t-test and paired sample t-test in SPSS 20 program. The finding showed that the p-output (sig.(2-tailed)) was 0.004 lower than 0.05 and the t-value 2.990 was higher than t-table 1.667. Therefore it could be stated that the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted. It means that narrative reading comprehension by using Coop-Dis-Q strategy had a significant improvement on the students’ reading comprehension achievement.
运用合作讨论式提问策略对马塔班十年级学生叙事阅读的影响
本研究的目的是了解采用Coop-Dis-Q策略教学的十年级学生的阅读理解成绩与未采用Coop-Dis-Q策略教学的十年级学生的阅读理解成绩是否有显著差异,以及在采用Coop-Dis-Q策略教学的十年级学生的叙事阅读理解成绩在治疗前后是否有显著改善。样本是70名学生。在收集数据时,对实验组和对照组分别进行前测和后测两次测试。数据分析采用SPSS 20软件的独立样本t检验和配对样本t检验。结果显示,p-output (sig.(2-tailed))比0.05低0.004,t值2.990高于t表1.667。因此,可以说,零假设(Ho)被拒绝,备择假设(Ha)被接受。这意味着运用Coop-Dis-Q策略的叙事阅读理解对学生的阅读理解成绩有显著的提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信