Gender preference in gynecology and obstetrics (GPGO) scale

S. E. Hage, Michael Daaboul, Georgio Sayde, Omar Ismail, Youssef Jamaleddine, S. Hallit, P. Salameh
{"title":"Gender preference in gynecology and obstetrics (GPGO) scale","authors":"S. E. Hage, Michael Daaboul, Georgio Sayde, Omar Ismail, Youssef Jamaleddine, S. Hallit, P. Salameh","doi":"10.2174/1573404819666220608104811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nPatients' preferences towards their physicians constitute a crucial part of providing patient-centered care. Gender preference of patients towards gynecologists/obstetricians is controversial.\n\n\n\nAuthors aimed to develop and validate a scale that specifically assesses gender preferences of patients towards physicians in the obstetrics and gynecology field.\n\n\n\nEpidemiological cross-sectional study in Lebanon conducted on 1192 participants. Questionnaire used consist of two parts: the first part sociodemographic questions and obstetrics and gynecology specialists overview and the second part was divided into males' and females' perceptions towards gynecologists. The new developed GPGO scale, consisting of 13 items, was only intended for females. Statistical analysis was performed to test the internal reliability, convergent validity, and construct validity.\nOverall, there were 1192 responses, 890 females and 302 males. In this study, we only included females’ responses.\n\n\n\nTests of assumptions of sample adequacy showed communalities higher than 0.3. Factor analysis of the 13 items in the GPGO scale revealed two main components. Items adequately loaded into its component. The scale’s Cronbach alpha, indicating internal reliability, revealed good reliability (0.861). Component 1 had acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach alpha= 0.745). Component 2 had high internal reliability (Cronbach alpha= 0.846). Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.877 (p<0.0001) and 0.898 (p<0.0001), respectively. Therefore, the scale shows adequate convergent validity.\n\n\n\nThe resulting GPGO scale, that assesses the preference of patients towards gynecologists and obstetricians, is validated for use in females aged 18 years old and higher. The scale can be used in future studies for comparison or prospective follow-up.\n","PeriodicalId":371340,"journal":{"name":"Current Womens Health Reviews","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Womens Health Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1573404819666220608104811","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients' preferences towards their physicians constitute a crucial part of providing patient-centered care. Gender preference of patients towards gynecologists/obstetricians is controversial. Authors aimed to develop and validate a scale that specifically assesses gender preferences of patients towards physicians in the obstetrics and gynecology field. Epidemiological cross-sectional study in Lebanon conducted on 1192 participants. Questionnaire used consist of two parts: the first part sociodemographic questions and obstetrics and gynecology specialists overview and the second part was divided into males' and females' perceptions towards gynecologists. The new developed GPGO scale, consisting of 13 items, was only intended for females. Statistical analysis was performed to test the internal reliability, convergent validity, and construct validity. Overall, there were 1192 responses, 890 females and 302 males. In this study, we only included females’ responses. Tests of assumptions of sample adequacy showed communalities higher than 0.3. Factor analysis of the 13 items in the GPGO scale revealed two main components. Items adequately loaded into its component. The scale’s Cronbach alpha, indicating internal reliability, revealed good reliability (0.861). Component 1 had acceptable internal reliability (Cronbach alpha= 0.745). Component 2 had high internal reliability (Cronbach alpha= 0.846). Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.877 (p<0.0001) and 0.898 (p<0.0001), respectively. Therefore, the scale shows adequate convergent validity. The resulting GPGO scale, that assesses the preference of patients towards gynecologists and obstetricians, is validated for use in females aged 18 years old and higher. The scale can be used in future studies for comparison or prospective follow-up.
妇产科性别偏好(GPGO)量表
患者对医生的偏好是提供以患者为中心的护理的关键部分。患者对妇产科医生的性别偏好是有争议的。作者旨在开发和验证一个量表,专门评估患者对妇产科医生的性别偏好。在黎巴嫩对1192名参与者进行的流行病学横断面研究。使用的问卷由两部分组成:第一部分是社会人口学问题和妇产科专家概述,第二部分分为男性和女性对妇科医生的看法。新开发的GPGO量表由13个项目组成,仅适用于女性。统计分析检验了内部信度、收敛效度和结构效度。总共有1192份回复,其中女性890份,男性302份。在这项研究中,我们只包括了女性的反应。对样本充足性假设的检验表明,社区高于0.3。对GPGO量表的13个条目进行因子分析,发现两个主要成分。项充分加载到它的组件中。量表的Cronbach alpha(内部信度)信度较好(0.861)。成分1具有可接受的内部信度(Cronbach alpha= 0.745)。成分2具有较高的内部信度(Cronbach alpha= 0.846)。Pearson相关系数分别为0.877 (p<0.0001)和0.898 (p<0.0001)。因此,量表具有足够的收敛效度。由此产生的GPGO量表,评估患者对妇产科医生的偏好,被证实适用于18岁及以上的女性。该量表可用于今后的研究比较或前瞻性随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信