Evaluating Performance of Network Metrics for Bug Prediction in Software

S. Prateek, A. Pasala, L. Aracena
{"title":"Evaluating Performance of Network Metrics for Bug Prediction in Software","authors":"S. Prateek, A. Pasala, L. Aracena","doi":"10.1109/APSEC.2013.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Code-based metrics and network analysis based metrics are widely used to predict defects in software. However, their effectiveness in predicting bugs either individually or together is still actively researched. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of these metrics using three different techniques, namely, Logistic regression, Support vector machines and Random forests. We analysed the performance of these techniques under three different scenarios on a large dataset. The results show that code metrics outperform network metrics and also no considerable advantage in using both of them together. Further, an analysis on the influence of individual metrics for prediction of bugs shows that network metrics (except out-degree) are uninfluential.","PeriodicalId":187451,"journal":{"name":"2013 20th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 20th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/APSEC.2013.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Code-based metrics and network analysis based metrics are widely used to predict defects in software. However, their effectiveness in predicting bugs either individually or together is still actively researched. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of these metrics using three different techniques, namely, Logistic regression, Support vector machines and Random forests. We analysed the performance of these techniques under three different scenarios on a large dataset. The results show that code metrics outperform network metrics and also no considerable advantage in using both of them together. Further, an analysis on the influence of individual metrics for prediction of bugs shows that network metrics (except out-degree) are uninfluential.
软件Bug预测的网络指标性能评价
基于代码的度量和基于网络分析的度量被广泛用于预测软件中的缺陷。然而,它们在单独或共同预测bug方面的有效性仍在积极研究中。在本文中,我们使用三种不同的技术来评估这些指标的性能,即逻辑回归,支持向量机和随机森林。我们在一个大型数据集上分析了这些技术在三种不同场景下的性能。结果表明,代码度量优于网络度量,并且在同时使用它们时也没有相当大的优势。此外,对单个指标对预测bug的影响的分析表明,网络指标(除了输出度)没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书