Involvement of the Expert by the Defendant for an Examination during the Investigation of the Murder

Maryna Illiashenko, A. Sakovskyi
{"title":"Involvement of the Expert by the Defendant for an Examination during the Investigation of the Murder","authors":"Maryna Illiashenko, A. Sakovskyi","doi":"10.56215/01211214.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective. To study the possibilities and mechanisms of engaging an expert by a defense counsel in criminal proceedings on murder; to reveal the possibility of a defense counsel to engage an expert to conduct mandatory examinations in the investigation of murder; to formulate recommendations to the defense counsel on providing the expert who is engaged in the examination on the basis of his/her petition with objects and samples for expert examination. Methodology. The article uses a set of scientific methods, namely: terminological, systemic and structural, formal and logical, comparative legal. Scientific novelty. In criminal proceedings for murder, the defense may independently obtain an expert opinion on the basis of an agreement with an expert or an expert institution and submit it to the pre-trial investigation body or the court to substantiate its legal position. At the same time, it has been established that the defense cannot initiate forensic medical and forensic psychiatric examinations before an expert or expert institution due to legal conflicts between the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and the provisions of bylaws regulating the appointment of these types of forensic examinations. In order to obtain samples for examination, the accused was advised to involve a specialist in this procedural action or to obtain advice from him. Conclusions. In criminal proceedings for murder, the accused's ability to engage an expert to conduct an examination relates to the appointment of mandatory and optional examinations. To conduct mandatory forensic medical and forensic psychiatric examinations, the accused shall apply to the investigator or prosecutor for their appointment, and in case of refusal - to the investigating judge, submitting a corresponding petition. The inability of the accused to initiate forensic medical and forensic psychiatric examinations before an expert or expert institution violates the equal opportunities of the parties to criminal proceedings to present their evidence to the court and to prove their conviction in court. In order to ensure the possibility of conducting examinations in criminal proceedings on murder, the defense party initiating them shall submit to the investigator, prosecutor or investigating judge a request for specific objects and samples or obtain (request) them independently. When obtaining samples for examination, it is mandatory for the defense counsel who initiated the examination to be present in the presence of the relevant samples","PeriodicalId":111799,"journal":{"name":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","volume":"486 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Naukovij vìsnik Nacìonalʹnoï akademìï vnutrìšnìh sprav","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56215/01211214.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. To study the possibilities and mechanisms of engaging an expert by a defense counsel in criminal proceedings on murder; to reveal the possibility of a defense counsel to engage an expert to conduct mandatory examinations in the investigation of murder; to formulate recommendations to the defense counsel on providing the expert who is engaged in the examination on the basis of his/her petition with objects and samples for expert examination. Methodology. The article uses a set of scientific methods, namely: terminological, systemic and structural, formal and logical, comparative legal. Scientific novelty. In criminal proceedings for murder, the defense may independently obtain an expert opinion on the basis of an agreement with an expert or an expert institution and submit it to the pre-trial investigation body or the court to substantiate its legal position. At the same time, it has been established that the defense cannot initiate forensic medical and forensic psychiatric examinations before an expert or expert institution due to legal conflicts between the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of Ukraine and the provisions of bylaws regulating the appointment of these types of forensic examinations. In order to obtain samples for examination, the accused was advised to involve a specialist in this procedural action or to obtain advice from him. Conclusions. In criminal proceedings for murder, the accused's ability to engage an expert to conduct an examination relates to the appointment of mandatory and optional examinations. To conduct mandatory forensic medical and forensic psychiatric examinations, the accused shall apply to the investigator or prosecutor for their appointment, and in case of refusal - to the investigating judge, submitting a corresponding petition. The inability of the accused to initiate forensic medical and forensic psychiatric examinations before an expert or expert institution violates the equal opportunities of the parties to criminal proceedings to present their evidence to the court and to prove their conviction in court. In order to ensure the possibility of conducting examinations in criminal proceedings on murder, the defense party initiating them shall submit to the investigator, prosecutor or investigating judge a request for specific objects and samples or obtain (request) them independently. When obtaining samples for examination, it is mandatory for the defense counsel who initiated the examination to be present in the presence of the relevant samples
在调查谋杀案期间,被告人在专家的参与下进行检查
目标。研究在谋杀刑事诉讼中由辩护律师聘请专家的可能性和机制;揭示辩护人在谋杀调查中聘请专家进行强制性检查的可能性;向辩护人提出建议,根据辩护人的请求向从事鉴定的鉴定人提供鉴定人鉴定的物品和样品。方法。本文运用了一套科学的方法,即:术语法、系统法与结构法、形式法与逻辑法、比较法。科学的新奇。在杀人罪刑事诉讼中,辩护人可以根据与鉴定人或者鉴定人机构的协议,独立取得鉴定人的意见,向审前侦查机关或者法院提出,以证明其法律立场。与此同时,已经确定,辩方不能在专家或专家机构面前进行法医和法医精神检查,因为《乌克兰刑事诉讼法》的规定与规定指派这类法医检查的细则的规定之间存在法律冲突。为了取得供检查的样本,被告被建议在这一程序性行动中请一名专家或向他征求意见。结论。在谋杀刑事诉讼中,被告聘请专家进行检查的能力关系到强制性和非强制性检查的指定。为进行强制性法医和法医精神检查,被告应向调查员或检察官申请任命,如果被拒绝,应向调查法官提交相应的请愿书。被告无法在专家或专家机构面前进行法医和法医精神病检查,这违反了刑事诉讼各方向法院提交证据和在法庭上证明其定罪的平等机会。为保证在谋杀刑事诉讼中进行检验的可能性,发起检验的辩护人应当向侦查人员、检察官或者侦查法官提出索取特定物品和样品的请求或者自行取得(请求)。提取检验样本时,提出检验的辩护律师必须在场
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信