Improving power efficiency of underloaded pipelines with variable frequency drives

P. A. Revel-Muroz, Pjsc Transneft, G. N. Matveev, Leonid M. Bekker, Konstantin Y. Shtukaturov, Jsc Giprotruboprovod
{"title":"Improving power efficiency of underloaded pipelines with variable frequency drives","authors":"P. A. Revel-Muroz, Pjsc Transneft, G. N. Matveev, Leonid M. Bekker, Konstantin Y. Shtukaturov, Jsc Giprotruboprovod","doi":"10.28999/2514-541X-2020-4-1-4-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper considers the option to reduce power consumption in the operation of the underloaded trunk pipeline by engaging additional pump units with lower rotor r.p.m. control using variable frequency drive. Under these conditions, the operating point of the pumps (delivery rate, head) approaches to the rated output, thus increasing the efficiency of the pumps and decreasing the electricity power consumption for pumping operations. The paper presents comparative calculations of operating conditions for a section of the trunk pipeline with a specified pumping capacity of 35 million t/year (60 % of the design load) when one, two and three main line pumps with variable frequency drives are engaged. The power consumption for pumping is calculated using the dependence of the variable frequency drive and motor efficiencies on the electric motor load and rotational speed. Based on the results of calculations, the electric energy saving is determined when additional pumping units are engaged. The experience has shown that when the second main line pump was engaged, the electric energy saving for pumping was 3.7% compared to the condition with one pump running. However, if the third pump is engaged, the saving is only 1.9 % – the decrease is due to lower motor and variable frequency drive efficiencies in the underloaded condition.","PeriodicalId":262860,"journal":{"name":"Pipeline Science and Technology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pipeline Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28999/2514-541X-2020-4-1-4-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper considers the option to reduce power consumption in the operation of the underloaded trunk pipeline by engaging additional pump units with lower rotor r.p.m. control using variable frequency drive. Under these conditions, the operating point of the pumps (delivery rate, head) approaches to the rated output, thus increasing the efficiency of the pumps and decreasing the electricity power consumption for pumping operations. The paper presents comparative calculations of operating conditions for a section of the trunk pipeline with a specified pumping capacity of 35 million t/year (60 % of the design load) when one, two and three main line pumps with variable frequency drives are engaged. The power consumption for pumping is calculated using the dependence of the variable frequency drive and motor efficiencies on the electric motor load and rotational speed. Based on the results of calculations, the electric energy saving is determined when additional pumping units are engaged. The experience has shown that when the second main line pump was engaged, the electric energy saving for pumping was 3.7% compared to the condition with one pump running. However, if the third pump is engaged, the saving is only 1.9 % – the decrease is due to lower motor and variable frequency drive efficiencies in the underloaded condition.
用变频驱动提高欠载管道的功率效率
本文考虑了通过采用变频驱动的低转子转分控制的附加泵机组来降低欠载干流管道运行中的功率消耗的选择。在这种情况下,泵的工作点(输送速率、扬程)接近额定输出,从而提高了泵的效率,降低了泵的电力消耗。本文对某段指定抽水能力为3500万吨/年(占设计负荷的60%)的干流管道,分别采用1、2、3台变频主泵进行工况对比计算。利用变频驱动和电机效率对电机负载和转速的依赖来计算泵送的功耗。根据计算结果,确定增加抽油机时的电能节约量。经验表明,当第二主泵启动时,与单泵运行相比,泵送电能节约3.7%。然而,如果使用第三台泵,则仅节省1.9%,这是由于电机和变频驱动效率较低导致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信