Some Criticisms of Systems Management

H. Neal
{"title":"Some Criticisms of Systems Management","authors":"H. Neal","doi":"10.1109/IRET-EM.1961.5007598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As we began to evolve large integrated military systems for the missile age in the early 1950's, it became apparent that two arts had to develop simultaneously: one was that of developing a body of knowledge for designing large interdependent systems (systems engineering), and the other was that of developing managerial tools for controlling the business aspects of such systems developments (systems management). The problem was not automatically solved when, for example, the Air Force turned over to individual contractors the responsibility for entire systems. It was hoped that this line of action would insure the integration of all elements of each system, simplify fund justification, minimize costs, and guarantee operational readiness. Industry accepted this system philosophy. Unfortunately, from the management point of view we have not solved the problems of developing the tools necessary to control systems projects so that delivery schedules and financial objectives could be met. During the 1960's some of the elements of system integration control will swing back to government because industry has muffed the chance of a generation.","PeriodicalId":382847,"journal":{"name":"IRE Transactions on Engineering Management","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1961-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRE Transactions on Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IRET-EM.1961.5007598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As we began to evolve large integrated military systems for the missile age in the early 1950's, it became apparent that two arts had to develop simultaneously: one was that of developing a body of knowledge for designing large interdependent systems (systems engineering), and the other was that of developing managerial tools for controlling the business aspects of such systems developments (systems management). The problem was not automatically solved when, for example, the Air Force turned over to individual contractors the responsibility for entire systems. It was hoped that this line of action would insure the integration of all elements of each system, simplify fund justification, minimize costs, and guarantee operational readiness. Industry accepted this system philosophy. Unfortunately, from the management point of view we have not solved the problems of developing the tools necessary to control systems projects so that delivery schedules and financial objectives could be met. During the 1960's some of the elements of system integration control will swing back to government because industry has muffed the chance of a generation.
对系统管理的一些批评
当我们在20世纪50年代早期开始为导弹时代发展大型集成军事系统时,很明显,两种艺术必须同时发展:一种是为设计大型相互依赖的系统(系统工程)开发知识体系,另一种是为控制这些系统开发的业务方面开发管理工具(系统管理)。例如,当空军将整个系统的责任移交给个别承包商时,问题并没有自动解决。人们希望,这一行动方针将确保每个系统的所有组成部分的一体化,简化资金理由,尽量减少费用,并保证业务准备就绪。工业界接受了这种系统哲学。不幸的是,从管理的角度来看,我们还没有解决开发控制系统项目所需的工具的问题,以便能够满足交付时间表和财务目标。在20世纪60年代,系统集成控制的一些要素将回到政府手中,因为工业扼杀了一代人的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信