Classification of Villeins in Medieval Sicily

H. Takayama
{"title":"Classification of Villeins in Medieval Sicily","authors":"H. Takayama","doi":"10.4324/9781351022309-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"According to a traditional view, villeins in Norman Sicily consisted of two basic classes, those who owed their lords hereditary service in person and those who owed service with respect to the terms of their tenure of land. Scholars who recently examined relevant terms in Arabic documents seem to share this view. For example, Jeremy Johns showed us a list of Latin, Greek and Arabic words categorized into two groups, a class of “registered” villeins (ḥursh) and a class of “unregistered” villeins (muls), while Alex Metcalfe explains that Arabic and Greek terms to refer to villeins can be resolved into two basic categories, “registered” and “unregistered” families. In this paper, I will make it clear that muls and ḥursh were not a pair of opposite Arabic terms indicating two different classes of villeins, but that muls simply signify those who were not listed in the previous documents. It has been generally understood, mainly based on studies of France, that a social class of unfree peasants subject to lords through land tenure was formed in Western Europe during the eleventh and twelfth centuries.[1] Marc Block, a well-known French medievalist, considered that most peasants in the Middle Ages had been unfree and in the status of serfdom due to the following three points. First, they had to pay chevage, a kind of poll-money and a symbol of servitude. Second, they could not marry women living outside their lords’ domains unless they got their lords’ permission by making a large payment. Third, they had to pay mainmorte (death duty) to their lords when they bequeathed their property.[2] Hans Kurt Schulze, a German scholar, defines Bauern (sing. Bauer, peasants) in medieval Europe as those who belonged to rural population (as opposed to urban population), and explains that they constituted a quite uniform class as a whole in terms of social function, management style, and lifestyle, although they consisted of various people in free, semi-free, and unfree conditions, and varied greatly in terms of land tenure.[3] Scholars seem to have divided medieval peasants into slaves, unfree peasants, and free peasants in terms of degree of freedom, and sub-divided unfree peasants into serfs and villeins in terms of degree of dependence on their lords, although these divisions and definitions are quite artificial. As a matter of fact, there were various words supposed to indicate peasants in medieval Europe, and some of them were sometimes ambiguous and polysemous. It is important for us to clarify here the usage of some frequently used words, modern and medieval, for peasants of Medieval Europe. The English word “serf” (“serf” in French, “servo” in Italian) derives from the Latin word “servus”, while the English word “villein” (“vilain” in French, “villano” in Italian) comes from the Latin Classification of Villeins in Medieval Sicily","PeriodicalId":141432,"journal":{"name":"Sicily and the Mediterranean in the Middle Ages","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sicily and the Mediterranean in the Middle Ages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351022309-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

According to a traditional view, villeins in Norman Sicily consisted of two basic classes, those who owed their lords hereditary service in person and those who owed service with respect to the terms of their tenure of land. Scholars who recently examined relevant terms in Arabic documents seem to share this view. For example, Jeremy Johns showed us a list of Latin, Greek and Arabic words categorized into two groups, a class of “registered” villeins (ḥursh) and a class of “unregistered” villeins (muls), while Alex Metcalfe explains that Arabic and Greek terms to refer to villeins can be resolved into two basic categories, “registered” and “unregistered” families. In this paper, I will make it clear that muls and ḥursh were not a pair of opposite Arabic terms indicating two different classes of villeins, but that muls simply signify those who were not listed in the previous documents. It has been generally understood, mainly based on studies of France, that a social class of unfree peasants subject to lords through land tenure was formed in Western Europe during the eleventh and twelfth centuries.[1] Marc Block, a well-known French medievalist, considered that most peasants in the Middle Ages had been unfree and in the status of serfdom due to the following three points. First, they had to pay chevage, a kind of poll-money and a symbol of servitude. Second, they could not marry women living outside their lords’ domains unless they got their lords’ permission by making a large payment. Third, they had to pay mainmorte (death duty) to their lords when they bequeathed their property.[2] Hans Kurt Schulze, a German scholar, defines Bauern (sing. Bauer, peasants) in medieval Europe as those who belonged to rural population (as opposed to urban population), and explains that they constituted a quite uniform class as a whole in terms of social function, management style, and lifestyle, although they consisted of various people in free, semi-free, and unfree conditions, and varied greatly in terms of land tenure.[3] Scholars seem to have divided medieval peasants into slaves, unfree peasants, and free peasants in terms of degree of freedom, and sub-divided unfree peasants into serfs and villeins in terms of degree of dependence on their lords, although these divisions and definitions are quite artificial. As a matter of fact, there were various words supposed to indicate peasants in medieval Europe, and some of them were sometimes ambiguous and polysemous. It is important for us to clarify here the usage of some frequently used words, modern and medieval, for peasants of Medieval Europe. The English word “serf” (“serf” in French, “servo” in Italian) derives from the Latin word “servus”, while the English word “villein” (“vilain” in French, “villano” in Italian) comes from the Latin Classification of Villeins in Medieval Sicily
中世纪西西里岛维林的分类
根据传统观点,诺曼西西里的佃农由两个基本阶层组成,一种是亲自向领主世袭服务,另一种是根据土地保有条款向领主服务。最近研究阿拉伯文文献中相关术语的学者似乎也同意这一观点。例如,Jeremy Johns向我们展示了一系列拉丁语、希腊语和阿拉伯语的单词,这些单词被分为两组,一类是“已注册的”villeins (ḥursh),另一类是“未注册的”villeins (muls),而Alex Metcalfe解释说,阿拉伯语和希腊语中涉及villeins的术语可以分为两个基本类别,“已注册的”和“未注册的”家庭。在本文中,我将明确说明muls和ḥursh并不是一对相反的阿拉伯语术语,表示两种不同的贵族阶级,muls只是表示那些没有在前面的文件中列出的人。人们普遍认为,主要根据对法国的研究,西欧在11世纪和12世纪形成了一个由不自由的农民组成的社会阶级,他们通过土地所有权受制于领主法国著名的中世纪学家马克·布洛克认为,中世纪的大多数农民是不自由的,处于农奴制的地位,原因有以下三点。首先,他们必须支付一种票选费,一种奴役的象征。其次,他们不能娶住在领主领地之外的女人,除非他们支付一大笔钱得到领主的允许。第三,当他们遗赠财产时,他们必须向他们的领主支付遗产税德国学者汉斯·库尔特·舒尔茨将鲍恩定义为“歌唱”。鲍尔(Bauer,农民)将中世纪欧洲的农民视为属于农村人口(与城市人口相对)的人,并解释说,他们在社会功能、管理方式和生活方式方面作为一个整体构成了一个相当统一的阶级,尽管他们由自由、半自由和不自由的各种人组成,并且在土地使用权方面存在很大差异学者们似乎根据自由程度将中世纪农民分为奴隶、不自由农民和自由农民,并根据对领主的依赖程度将不自由农民细分为农奴和农奴,尽管这些划分和定义相当人为。事实上,在中世纪的欧洲,有很多用来表示农民的词,其中有些词有时是模棱两可的,而且是多义的。在这里,我们有必要澄清中世纪欧洲农民常用的一些现代和中世纪词汇的用法。英语单词“serf”(法语为“serf”,意大利语为“servo”)源于拉丁语单词“servus”,而英语单词“villein”(法语为“vilain”,意大利语为“villano”)来自中世纪西西里岛的拉丁语“villein分类”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信