Discrepancy or Cohesion Between Expected and Achieved Results

I. Golubović-Ilić, Slađana Stanković
{"title":"Discrepancy or Cohesion Between Expected and Achieved Results","authors":"I. Golubović-Ilić, Slađana Stanković","doi":"10.46793/pctja.19.37gi","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The basic idea behind all educational reforms in Serbia in the past was based on a tendency to be compatible with the European educational system or to somehow come closer to it. These reforms were mostly only partial, focused on cor rections and changes in the direction of improving certain segments of the educational system (plans, programs, textbooks, and extension of education) so that the expected results were not in fact achieved. Taking into account that the teacher is a key player in an educational reform process (because he/she educates those who will educate future generations), the education policy makers in 2012 formed a Strategy for the Development of Education in Serbia until 2020 , which included, besides other things, measures, proposals and solutions to improve teacher education. The aim of the paper was to use the comparative and theoretical analysis method in order to determine whether there is discrepancy or cohesion between the competences expected of teachers in the 21st century and those that future teachers acquire at the Faculty of Education in Jagodina, University of Kragujevac. By comparing the study programs of the final years of basic academic studies of students − future class teachers and the Regulations and standards of competencies for the teacher profession (primarily class teachers), we have come to the conclusion that the elements that were the subject of our analysis are not suffi-ciently coherent, mutually unrelated and incompatible. On the basis of the results of our research, we propose that a reform of the study programs of compulsory subjects (primarily the teaching methodologies) should be carried out during the next accreditation period. The research will outline some amendments that could be introduced and will enable future teachers to attain the highest standards of competencies and, in all teaching areas, better qualify for their profession.","PeriodicalId":405141,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference Professional Competences for Teaching in the 21st Century","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference Professional Competences for Teaching in the 21st Century","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46793/pctja.19.37gi","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The basic idea behind all educational reforms in Serbia in the past was based on a tendency to be compatible with the European educational system or to somehow come closer to it. These reforms were mostly only partial, focused on cor rections and changes in the direction of improving certain segments of the educational system (plans, programs, textbooks, and extension of education) so that the expected results were not in fact achieved. Taking into account that the teacher is a key player in an educational reform process (because he/she educates those who will educate future generations), the education policy makers in 2012 formed a Strategy for the Development of Education in Serbia until 2020 , which included, besides other things, measures, proposals and solutions to improve teacher education. The aim of the paper was to use the comparative and theoretical analysis method in order to determine whether there is discrepancy or cohesion between the competences expected of teachers in the 21st century and those that future teachers acquire at the Faculty of Education in Jagodina, University of Kragujevac. By comparing the study programs of the final years of basic academic studies of students − future class teachers and the Regulations and standards of competencies for the teacher profession (primarily class teachers), we have come to the conclusion that the elements that were the subject of our analysis are not suffi-ciently coherent, mutually unrelated and incompatible. On the basis of the results of our research, we propose that a reform of the study programs of compulsory subjects (primarily the teaching methodologies) should be carried out during the next accreditation period. The research will outline some amendments that could be introduced and will enable future teachers to attain the highest standards of competencies and, in all teaching areas, better qualify for their profession.
预期结果与实际结果之间的差异或一致性
塞尔维亚过去所有教育改革的基本思想都是基于与欧洲教育制度相适应或以某种方式向欧洲教育制度靠拢的趋势。这些改革大多只是局部的,集中在改善教育系统某些部分(计划、课程、教科书和教育扩展)的方向上的修正和改变,因此预期的结果实际上并没有达到。考虑到教师是教育改革进程中的关键角色(因为他/她教育那些将教育后代的人),教育政策制定者于2012年制定了《塞尔维亚至2020年教育发展战略》,除其他外,其中包括改善教师教育的措施、建议和解决办法。本文的目的是利用比较和理论分析的方法来确定21世纪教师所期望的能力与克拉古耶瓦茨大学雅戈迪纳教育学院未来教师所获得的能力之间是否存在差异或衔接。通过比较学生——未来的班主任——最后几年基础学术研究的学习计划和教师职业(主要是班主任)能力的规定和标准,我们得出的结论是,作为我们分析主题的要素不够连贯,相互不相关和不相容。根据我们的研究结果,我们建议在下一个认证期对必修科目的学习计划(主要是教学方法)进行改革。这项研究将概述一些可以引入的修订,使未来的教师能够达到最高的能力标准,并在所有教学领域更好地胜任他们的职业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信