Classifying sentiment in arabic social networks: Naïve search versus Naïve bayes

M. Itani, R. Zantout, L. Hamandi
{"title":"Classifying sentiment in arabic social networks: Naïve search versus Naïve bayes","authors":"M. Itani, R. Zantout, L. Hamandi","doi":"10.1109/ICTEA.2012.6462864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social networks contain large amounts of posts of different data types (text, images, sounds and videos). Textual posts express authors' opinions (with or against) or feeling (love, hate, optimism, pessimism, or anger). Such opinions are important for commercial and governmental organization since they help checking public opinion about a product, policy or an object in general. In this paper we present the application of two different approaches to classify Arabic Facebook posts. The first one depends on syntactic features, using common patterns used in different Arabic dialects to express opinions. These patterns achieved high accuracy in determining the polarity of a sentiment even when tested against new corpus. This approach acts on informal Arabic text, which has not been addressed before. Different setups were tried and the highest coverage and accuracy achieved were 49.5% and 83.4 % respectively. The second approach is an ordinary probabilistic model, Naïve-Bayes classifier, that assumes the independence of features in determining the class the highest coverage achieved in this approach was 60.5% in the first setup and 91.2% when Naïve search was used as a binary classifier to classify the posts as objective or subjective.","PeriodicalId":245530,"journal":{"name":"2012 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computational Tools for Engineering Applications (ACTEA)","volume":"308 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"37","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 2nd International Conference on Advances in Computational Tools for Engineering Applications (ACTEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTEA.2012.6462864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 37

Abstract

Social networks contain large amounts of posts of different data types (text, images, sounds and videos). Textual posts express authors' opinions (with or against) or feeling (love, hate, optimism, pessimism, or anger). Such opinions are important for commercial and governmental organization since they help checking public opinion about a product, policy or an object in general. In this paper we present the application of two different approaches to classify Arabic Facebook posts. The first one depends on syntactic features, using common patterns used in different Arabic dialects to express opinions. These patterns achieved high accuracy in determining the polarity of a sentiment even when tested against new corpus. This approach acts on informal Arabic text, which has not been addressed before. Different setups were tried and the highest coverage and accuracy achieved were 49.5% and 83.4 % respectively. The second approach is an ordinary probabilistic model, Naïve-Bayes classifier, that assumes the independence of features in determining the class the highest coverage achieved in this approach was 60.5% in the first setup and 91.2% when Naïve search was used as a binary classifier to classify the posts as objective or subjective.
阿拉伯社会网络中的情感分类:Naïve搜索与Naïve贝叶斯
社交网络包含大量不同数据类型(文本、图像、声音和视频)的帖子。文字帖子表达了作者的观点(赞成或反对)或感受(爱、恨、乐观、悲观或愤怒)。这些意见对商业和政府组织很重要,因为它们有助于检查公众对产品、政策或一般对象的意见。在本文中,我们提出了两种不同的方法来分类阿拉伯语Facebook帖子的应用。第一种依赖于句法特征,使用不同阿拉伯方言中使用的共同模式来表达观点。这些模式在确定情感极性方面取得了很高的准确性,即使是在对新语料库进行测试时也是如此。这一办法适用于以前没有讨论过的非正式阿拉伯文本。试验了不同的设置,最高的覆盖率和准确率分别为49.5%和83.4%。第二种方法是一个普通的概率模型,Naïve-Bayes分类器,它假设在确定类别时特征的独立性,在该方法中实现的最高覆盖率在第一次设置中为60.5%,当Naïve搜索作为二元分类器将帖子分类为客观或主观时为91.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信