Elphinstone, Geography, and the Spectre of Afghanistan in the Himalaya

Kyle J. Gardner
{"title":"Elphinstone, Geography, and the Spectre of Afghanistan in the Himalaya","authors":"Kyle J. Gardner","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes the \"Elphinstonian episteme\" in the context of the northwestern Himalayas, a region centered on the historical \"entrepot\" of Ladakh. The combination of cartographic, ethnographic and scientific practices exhibited in the Elphinstone mission of 1808-09 were repeated a decade later in the north-western Himalayas by William Moorcroft and George Trebeck, and were extended by two British boundary commissions in the 1840s. The results of these commissions were compiled in Alexander Cunningham's composite account, \"Ladak: Physical, Statistical, and Historical\" (1854), a text which has done for Ladakh Studies what Elphinstone's \"Account of the Kingdom of Caubul\" has done for Afghanistan Studies. This chapter surveys the place of geography within Elphinstone's, Moorcroft's and Cunningham's texts, before exploring how the assertion of borderlines within these geographical conceptions conflicted with indigenous understandings of territory. By comparing these texts, this chapter traces the development of colonial geographical knowledge. Not only are these texts fundamentally concerned with the construction of political space, they also reflect a specific hierarchy of information that reflects broader colonial understandings of territoriality.","PeriodicalId":403338,"journal":{"name":"Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountstuart Elphinstone in South Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190914400.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter analyzes the "Elphinstonian episteme" in the context of the northwestern Himalayas, a region centered on the historical "entrepot" of Ladakh. The combination of cartographic, ethnographic and scientific practices exhibited in the Elphinstone mission of 1808-09 were repeated a decade later in the north-western Himalayas by William Moorcroft and George Trebeck, and were extended by two British boundary commissions in the 1840s. The results of these commissions were compiled in Alexander Cunningham's composite account, "Ladak: Physical, Statistical, and Historical" (1854), a text which has done for Ladakh Studies what Elphinstone's "Account of the Kingdom of Caubul" has done for Afghanistan Studies. This chapter surveys the place of geography within Elphinstone's, Moorcroft's and Cunningham's texts, before exploring how the assertion of borderlines within these geographical conceptions conflicted with indigenous understandings of territory. By comparing these texts, this chapter traces the development of colonial geographical knowledge. Not only are these texts fundamentally concerned with the construction of political space, they also reflect a specific hierarchy of information that reflects broader colonial understandings of territoriality.
埃尔芬斯通,地理,和喜马拉雅山的阿富汗幽灵
本章分析了以历史上的“转口港”拉达克为中心的西北喜马拉雅地区的“埃尔芬斯顿知识论”。1808-09年埃尔芬斯通考察中所展示的制图、人种学和科学实践的结合,10年后威廉·穆尔克罗夫特(William Moorcroft)和乔治·特雷贝克(George Trebeck)在喜马拉雅山脉西北部重复了这一做法,并在19世纪40年代由两个英国边界委员会进行了扩展。这些委员会的研究结果汇编在亚历山大·坎宁安的综合报告《拉达克:物理、统计和历史》(1854年)中,该书对拉达克研究的贡献就像埃尔芬斯通的《喀布尔王国报告》对阿富汗研究的贡献一样。本章考察了地理在埃尔芬斯通、穆尔克罗夫特和坎宁安文本中的位置,然后探讨了这些地理概念中的边界主张如何与土著对领土的理解相冲突。通过对这些文本的比较,本章追溯了殖民地地理知识的发展。这些文本不仅从根本上与政治空间的建构有关,而且还反映了一种特定的信息层次,这种信息层次反映了对领土的更广泛的殖民理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信