Was Saint Bishop Nicholai a Fascist? A Review of His Addresses from March 1935 to April 1941

Željko Perović
{"title":"Was Saint Bishop Nicholai a Fascist? A Review of His Addresses from March 1935 to April 1941","authors":"Željko Perović","doi":"10.46825/nicholaistudies/ns.2021.1.2.395-434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: The author addresses the issue of Nicholai Velimirovich’s attitude towards fascism, responding to the criticism of Bishop Nicholai as a sympathizer of Adolph Hitler’s policy and the interpretation of Velimirovich’s thoughts that enabled such constructions. In the present article, special attention is paid to the public addresses of Nicholai Velimirovich during the period of the rise of the Nazi state, i.e. from 1935 to 1941. The main topic of this article is to deconstruct the great myth of Bishop Nicholai’s critics, which reads:\nSaint Bishop Nicholai is a fascist because he received a decoration from Hitler in 1934, and in 1935 he gave a lecture at Kolarac called “Nationalism of Saint Sava” where he praised Hitler as few people did during the life of the Reich leader, comparing him with Saint Sava, “whereby Hitler turned out to be bigger than Saint Sava.” This accusation comes from the critics of Bishop Nicholai from Peščanik, whose pamphlets are adopted and passed on by a part of the Serbian intelligentsia in which there are historians, linguists, political scientists, and even theologians. However, such constructions are possible only if we ignore the legacy of Bishop Nicholai and his thought.\nFor instance, it is interesting that in the same year, namely in 1926, Hitler and Velimirovich published two completely opposite works — Hitler the second part of his Mein Kampf in which he revealed his racial theory to the world, and Nicholai a short article entitled “The Problem of Races,” in which he explained that the problem of race can not solve anthropologists, nor historians and psychologists, but only Christianity, urging Serbian youth not to make a value difference between races, but to consider whether a black earthen pot with honey or a white porcelain pot with vinegar is better. In his later works, there are much more references to the issues of racism, nationalism, chauvinism, etc., where he clearly holds moderated and balanced Christian worldview.","PeriodicalId":373116,"journal":{"name":"The Nicholai Studies: International Journal for Research of Theological and Ecclesiastical Contribution of Nicholai Velimirovich","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Nicholai Studies: International Journal for Research of Theological and Ecclesiastical Contribution of Nicholai Velimirovich","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46825/nicholaistudies/ns.2021.1.2.395-434","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: The author addresses the issue of Nicholai Velimirovich’s attitude towards fascism, responding to the criticism of Bishop Nicholai as a sympathizer of Adolph Hitler’s policy and the interpretation of Velimirovich’s thoughts that enabled such constructions. In the present article, special attention is paid to the public addresses of Nicholai Velimirovich during the period of the rise of the Nazi state, i.e. from 1935 to 1941. The main topic of this article is to deconstruct the great myth of Bishop Nicholai’s critics, which reads: Saint Bishop Nicholai is a fascist because he received a decoration from Hitler in 1934, and in 1935 he gave a lecture at Kolarac called “Nationalism of Saint Sava” where he praised Hitler as few people did during the life of the Reich leader, comparing him with Saint Sava, “whereby Hitler turned out to be bigger than Saint Sava.” This accusation comes from the critics of Bishop Nicholai from Peščanik, whose pamphlets are adopted and passed on by a part of the Serbian intelligentsia in which there are historians, linguists, political scientists, and even theologians. However, such constructions are possible only if we ignore the legacy of Bishop Nicholai and his thought. For instance, it is interesting that in the same year, namely in 1926, Hitler and Velimirovich published two completely opposite works — Hitler the second part of his Mein Kampf in which he revealed his racial theory to the world, and Nicholai a short article entitled “The Problem of Races,” in which he explained that the problem of race can not solve anthropologists, nor historians and psychologists, but only Christianity, urging Serbian youth not to make a value difference between races, but to consider whether a black earthen pot with honey or a white porcelain pot with vinegar is better. In his later works, there are much more references to the issues of racism, nationalism, chauvinism, etc., where he clearly holds moderated and balanced Christian worldview.
圣尼古拉主教是法西斯主义者吗?一九三五年三月至一九四一年四月的演说回顾
摘要:针对尼古拉主教被批评为阿道夫·希特勒政策的同情者,以及对维利米罗维奇思想的解读,作者探讨了维利米罗维奇对法西斯主义的态度问题。在本文中,特别关注的是在纳粹国家崛起期间,即从1935年到1941年,尼古拉·韦利米罗维奇的公开演讲。这篇文章的主要主题是解构尼古拉主教批评者的伟大神话,其中写道:圣尼古拉主教是法西斯主义者,因为他在1934年接受了希特勒的勋章,1935年他在科拉拉克做了一个名为“圣萨瓦的民族主义”的演讲,他在帝国领导人的一生中很少有人称赞希特勒,将他与圣萨瓦相提并论,“希特勒原来比圣萨瓦更伟大。”这一指控来自Peščanik对Nicholai主教的批评,他的小册子被一部分塞尔维亚知识分子采用和传播,其中包括历史学家、语言学家、政治学家,甚至神学家。然而,只有当我们忽略尼古拉主教的遗产和他的思想时,这样的构建才有可能。例如,有趣的是,在同一年,即1926年,希特勒和维里米罗维奇出版了两部完全相反的作品——希特勒的第二部分我的奋斗中,他向世界透露他的种族理论,和Nicholai一小篇题为“种族的问题,”他解释说,种族的问题不能解决人类学家,历史学家和心理学家,但只有基督教,敦促塞尔维亚青年不要种族值差异,但考虑是否黑色砂锅与蜂蜜或白色瓷锅用醋更好。在他后期的作品中,更多地提到了种族主义、民族主义、沙文主义等问题,他显然持有温和而平衡的基督教世界观。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信