Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (current aspects)

K. Ramazanov, N. Akhvlediani, A. V. Savchenko, D. Pushkar
{"title":"Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter for urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy (current aspects)","authors":"K. Ramazanov, N. Akhvlediani, A. V. Savchenko, D. Pushkar","doi":"10.17650/1726-9784-2022-23-1-21-29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stress urinary incontinence is a debilitating condition for men, caused in most cases by radical prostatectomy. Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter is the “golden standard” of operative correction of this pathological condition in intermediate and severe cases. The article present literature review on comparative effectiveness and safety of implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in men.The study objective is to study the current concepts of implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in males, as well as its effectiveness and safety.Literature search was performed using PubMed/Medline and SCOPUS databases with the following key words: stress urinary incontinence, radical prostatectomy, artificial urinary sphincter. Inclusion criteria for the studies were follow-up longer than 12 months and definition of successful result as use of 1 or less liner a day; current studies on effectiveness of prosthesis implantation with large patient population were also included. Special focus was made on the historical development of artificial sphincters, problems of comparison of the effectiveness of male slings and artificial urinary sphincter, as well as simultaneous implantation of a sphincter and a penile prosthesis. We have used 43 articles complying with the inclusion criteria, our aim, and objectives.In the considered literature, effectiveness and safety of implantation were studied primarily (70 %) for the AMS 800 implant. It was noted that the frequency of revisions of its implantation can reach 30 %. For other models of artificial sphincters, the data is sparce. Comparison of the effectiveness of artificial sphincter and male sling implantations mostly was performed for patient groups with incomparable severity of urinary incontinence. Patients’ preferences and cost had the largest effect on the choice of single-step or subsequent implantation of a penile prosthesis and an artificial urinary sphincter.Implantation of АМS 800 is an effective but not perfectly safe method of operative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in males. Development and study of new prostheses of this category are necessary.","PeriodicalId":368206,"journal":{"name":"Andrology and Genital Surgery","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Andrology and Genital Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17650/1726-9784-2022-23-1-21-29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stress urinary incontinence is a debilitating condition for men, caused in most cases by radical prostatectomy. Implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter is the “golden standard” of operative correction of this pathological condition in intermediate and severe cases. The article present literature review on comparative effectiveness and safety of implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in men.The study objective is to study the current concepts of implantation of an artificial urinary sphincter in males, as well as its effectiveness and safety.Literature search was performed using PubMed/Medline and SCOPUS databases with the following key words: stress urinary incontinence, radical prostatectomy, artificial urinary sphincter. Inclusion criteria for the studies were follow-up longer than 12 months and definition of successful result as use of 1 or less liner a day; current studies on effectiveness of prosthesis implantation with large patient population were also included. Special focus was made on the historical development of artificial sphincters, problems of comparison of the effectiveness of male slings and artificial urinary sphincter, as well as simultaneous implantation of a sphincter and a penile prosthesis. We have used 43 articles complying with the inclusion criteria, our aim, and objectives.In the considered literature, effectiveness and safety of implantation were studied primarily (70 %) for the AMS 800 implant. It was noted that the frequency of revisions of its implantation can reach 30 %. For other models of artificial sphincters, the data is sparce. Comparison of the effectiveness of artificial sphincter and male sling implantations mostly was performed for patient groups with incomparable severity of urinary incontinence. Patients’ preferences and cost had the largest effect on the choice of single-step or subsequent implantation of a penile prosthesis and an artificial urinary sphincter.Implantation of АМS 800 is an effective but not perfectly safe method of operative treatment of stress urinary incontinence in males. Development and study of new prostheses of this category are necessary.
人工尿道括约肌植入术治疗根治性前列腺切除术后尿失禁(现状)
压力性尿失禁是一种使男性衰弱的疾病,在大多数情况下是由根治性前列腺切除术引起的。在中重度病例中,人工尿括约肌植入是手术矫正这种病理状况的“黄金标准”。本文就男性人工尿道括约肌植入术的有效性和安全性进行文献综述。本研究的目的是研究目前男性人工尿道括约肌植入术的概念及其有效性和安全性。使用PubMed/Medline和SCOPUS数据库进行文献检索,关键词:应激性尿失禁,根治性前列腺切除术,人工尿道括约肌。研究的纳入标准是随访时间超过12个月,并将成功结果定义为每天使用1个或更少的药物;本文还包括了目前在大患者群体中对假体植入有效性的研究。重点介绍了人工括约肌的历史发展,男性背带与人工尿道括约肌的有效性比较问题,以及同时植入括约肌和阴茎假体的问题。我们使用了43篇符合纳入标准、我们的目的和目标的文章。在所考虑的文献中,主要研究了AMS 800种植体的有效性和安全性(70%)。有人指出,其植入的修正频率可达30%。对于其他型号的人工括约肌,数据是空白的。人工括约肌与男性吊带植入的效果比较多是针对尿失禁严重程度不可比较的患者组进行的。患者的偏好和费用对选择单步或后续阴茎假体植入和人工尿道括约肌植入的影响最大。植入АМS 800是一种有效但不完全安全的手术治疗男性压力性尿失禁的方法。开发和研究这类新型假体是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信