From Open Science to Open Source (and beyond): A Historical Perspective on Open Practices without and with IT

Bastian Wolff, D. Schlagwein
{"title":"From Open Science to Open Source (and beyond): A Historical Perspective on Open Practices without and with IT","authors":"Bastian Wolff, D. Schlagwein","doi":"10.1145/3479986.3479990","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Openness as organizational philosophy and theoretical concept has continuously gained importance over the past decades. While the adoption of open practices such as open-source development or crowdsourcing is primarily academically observed in the 20th and 21st century, organizational practices adopting or facilitating openness have already been applied before there was an understanding what openness actually depicts. For centuries, public and private stakeholders utilized a broad variety of open practices such as open science, industrial exhibitions, solution sourcing or industrial democracy in order to achieve certain anticipated effects – fully in the absence of IT. Due to the missing historical understanding, this paper provides a first holistic historical perspective on the emergence of open practices, considering the context of the political, technological and societal developments. Utilizing a structured literature review, the paper puts a special focus on the historical narrative and the connection between openness without and with IT. The paper concludes that open practices are not a recent phenomenon, but were already applied successfully by affected stakeholders in previous centuries, whereas applied open practices partly build upon each other and show resembling patterns. Historically, two central shifts are identified: (1) a shift from government-driven towards organization- and community-driven open practices, and (2) a shift from mainly transparency-oriented open practices towards a stronger utilization of inclusion.","PeriodicalId":159312,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Open Collaboration","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Open Collaboration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3479986.3479990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Openness as organizational philosophy and theoretical concept has continuously gained importance over the past decades. While the adoption of open practices such as open-source development or crowdsourcing is primarily academically observed in the 20th and 21st century, organizational practices adopting or facilitating openness have already been applied before there was an understanding what openness actually depicts. For centuries, public and private stakeholders utilized a broad variety of open practices such as open science, industrial exhibitions, solution sourcing or industrial democracy in order to achieve certain anticipated effects – fully in the absence of IT. Due to the missing historical understanding, this paper provides a first holistic historical perspective on the emergence of open practices, considering the context of the political, technological and societal developments. Utilizing a structured literature review, the paper puts a special focus on the historical narrative and the connection between openness without and with IT. The paper concludes that open practices are not a recent phenomenon, but were already applied successfully by affected stakeholders in previous centuries, whereas applied open practices partly build upon each other and show resembling patterns. Historically, two central shifts are identified: (1) a shift from government-driven towards organization- and community-driven open practices, and (2) a shift from mainly transparency-oriented open practices towards a stronger utilization of inclusion.
从开放科学到开源(以及其他):从历史角度看没有IT和有IT的开放实践
开放作为一种组织理念和理论概念,在过去的几十年里不断得到重视。虽然开放实践(如开源开发或众包)的采用主要是在20世纪和21世纪的学术上观察到的,但采用或促进开放的组织实践在理解开放实际描述之前就已经应用了。几个世纪以来,公共和私人利益相关者利用各种各样的开放实践,如开放科学、工业展览、解决方案采购或工业民主,以达到某些预期的效果——完全在没有IT的情况下。由于缺乏对历史的理解,本文从政治、技术和社会发展的背景出发,对开放实践的出现提供了第一个整体的历史视角。利用结构化的文献综述,本文特别关注历史叙述以及没有IT和有IT的开放之间的联系。本文的结论是,开放实践不是最近才出现的现象,而是在前几个世纪就已经被受影响的利益相关者成功地应用了,而应用的开放实践部分地建立在彼此的基础上,并显示出类似的模式。从历史上看,确定了两个中心转变:(1)从政府驱动转向组织和社区驱动的开放实践;(2)从主要以透明度为导向的开放实践转向更强地利用包容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信