Flight Testing GLS Approaches using SBAS with the DLR A320 Advanced Technology Research Aircraft

T. Dautermann, T. Ludwig, R. Geister, Lutz Ehmke, Richard M. Unkelbach
{"title":"Flight Testing GLS Approaches using SBAS with the DLR A320 Advanced Technology Research Aircraft","authors":"T. Dautermann, T. Ludwig, R. Geister, Lutz Ehmke, Richard M. Unkelbach","doi":"10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We designed and built a system intended to combine the advantages of both the ground based and the satellite based augmentation systems (GBAS, SBAS) by using a converter between them. We installed a prototype system at Salzburg Airport and flight tested it on 12th of February 2020 using DLR's A320 test aircraft equipped with flight test instrumentation. Using our system, 3D GLS type approaches are possible at any airport within the coverage of the SBAS. The system includes an SBAS-capable global navigation satellite systems receiver with a database and a GBAS-compatible data link. The correction and integrity data received from the SBAS satellite are automatically translated into GBAS compatible structures and sent to the airborne GBAS receiver using the final approach segment data block Without SBAS the system can revert to differential GPS. In both GBAS and SBAS, instant integrity information is provided by estimating protection levels, a high probability bound for the computed position. This is then compared to the alert limit of the respective system. Since both systems are quite similar, and the SBAS signal can nowadays be decoded even by low cost receivers, one can receive the augmentation data from the SBAS, slightly modify it to fit into the GBAS data structure and broadcast this data to a GBAS equipped aircraft. Said aircraft could execute a RNP approach with the Localizer Performance and Vertical guidance (LPV) final approach segment which would otherwise not be available. This may come especially handy in places where no non-precision minima are published, such as the RNP-E approach into Innsbruck and Salzburg. Since there are slight differences between the two systems, we made sure that integrity for the safety-of-life approach service is ensured. We named the system GLASS (GLS Approaches using SbaS), built a prototype and tested it with real GBAS avionics hardware. We performed 4 approaches to Salzburg Airport in Austria (LOWS). Salzburg is now equipped with a RNP approach using LPV only to runway 15 with significantly a lower minimum than the RNP approach with LNAV minimum called the RNP E 15. This is due to the location of the new missed approach point. Using the GLASS system, all GLS equipped aircraft would be able to take advantage of this new minimum line. We followed the approach track using FMS guidance and recorded the ARINC 429 output from the Collins GLU925 Multimode Receiver (MMR). The GLASS guidance was provided to the pilot on the electronic flight bag display for reference. We show a complete analysis of integrity data, MMR status information and MMR output guidance. We compare the GLS data from the MMR with standard SBAS data from an onboard Septentrio PolaRx3 receiver. The GLASS system provides the LPV final approach segment to GLS-only equipped aircraft such as the Boeing 737-800. This can enable increased access to airports that are currently not equipped with an xLS type approach such as Innsbruck (LOWI). Especially approaches in France could be of interest, since the government has officially declared to decommission all category I ILS installations in favor of RNP approaches with LPV. The system could also be carried on the airborne side rather than be a fixed installation on the ground. With a pilot selectable FAS block, it could enable LPV approaches without modifications to existing airborne hardware. Thus, any GLS capable aircraft could fly LPV approaches without requiring ground infrastructure modifications. In this case, the protection level scaling from GBAS is not an issue, since it can be compensated for by the GLASS system.","PeriodicalId":112045,"journal":{"name":"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 AIAA/IEEE 39th Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DASC50938.2020.9256631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We designed and built a system intended to combine the advantages of both the ground based and the satellite based augmentation systems (GBAS, SBAS) by using a converter between them. We installed a prototype system at Salzburg Airport and flight tested it on 12th of February 2020 using DLR's A320 test aircraft equipped with flight test instrumentation. Using our system, 3D GLS type approaches are possible at any airport within the coverage of the SBAS. The system includes an SBAS-capable global navigation satellite systems receiver with a database and a GBAS-compatible data link. The correction and integrity data received from the SBAS satellite are automatically translated into GBAS compatible structures and sent to the airborne GBAS receiver using the final approach segment data block Without SBAS the system can revert to differential GPS. In both GBAS and SBAS, instant integrity information is provided by estimating protection levels, a high probability bound for the computed position. This is then compared to the alert limit of the respective system. Since both systems are quite similar, and the SBAS signal can nowadays be decoded even by low cost receivers, one can receive the augmentation data from the SBAS, slightly modify it to fit into the GBAS data structure and broadcast this data to a GBAS equipped aircraft. Said aircraft could execute a RNP approach with the Localizer Performance and Vertical guidance (LPV) final approach segment which would otherwise not be available. This may come especially handy in places where no non-precision minima are published, such as the RNP-E approach into Innsbruck and Salzburg. Since there are slight differences between the two systems, we made sure that integrity for the safety-of-life approach service is ensured. We named the system GLASS (GLS Approaches using SbaS), built a prototype and tested it with real GBAS avionics hardware. We performed 4 approaches to Salzburg Airport in Austria (LOWS). Salzburg is now equipped with a RNP approach using LPV only to runway 15 with significantly a lower minimum than the RNP approach with LNAV minimum called the RNP E 15. This is due to the location of the new missed approach point. Using the GLASS system, all GLS equipped aircraft would be able to take advantage of this new minimum line. We followed the approach track using FMS guidance and recorded the ARINC 429 output from the Collins GLU925 Multimode Receiver (MMR). The GLASS guidance was provided to the pilot on the electronic flight bag display for reference. We show a complete analysis of integrity data, MMR status information and MMR output guidance. We compare the GLS data from the MMR with standard SBAS data from an onboard Septentrio PolaRx3 receiver. The GLASS system provides the LPV final approach segment to GLS-only equipped aircraft such as the Boeing 737-800. This can enable increased access to airports that are currently not equipped with an xLS type approach such as Innsbruck (LOWI). Especially approaches in France could be of interest, since the government has officially declared to decommission all category I ILS installations in favor of RNP approaches with LPV. The system could also be carried on the airborne side rather than be a fixed installation on the ground. With a pilot selectable FAS block, it could enable LPV approaches without modifications to existing airborne hardware. Thus, any GLS capable aircraft could fly LPV approaches without requiring ground infrastructure modifications. In this case, the protection level scaling from GBAS is not an issue, since it can be compensated for by the GLASS system.
使用SBAS与DLR A320先进技术研究飞机进行GLS方法飞行测试
我们设计并建造了一个系统,旨在通过在地面和卫星增强系统(GBAS, SBAS)之间使用转换器来结合两者的优点。我们在萨尔茨堡机场安装了一个原型系统,并于2020年2月12日使用配备飞行测试仪器的DLR A320测试飞机对其进行了飞行测试。使用我们的系统,在SBAS覆盖范围内的任何机场都可以使用3D GLS类型的方法。该系统包括一个具备sbas能力的全球导航卫星系统接收器,带有一个数据库和一个与gbas兼容的数据链。从SBAS卫星接收到的校正和完整性数据自动转换成与GBAS兼容的结构,并使用最终进近段数据块发送到机载GBAS接收机,没有SBAS系统可以恢复到差分GPS。在GBAS和SBAS中,通过估计保护级别提供即时完整性信息,这是计算位置的高概率界限。然后将其与各自系统的警报限制进行比较。由于这两个系统非常相似,并且SBAS信号现在甚至可以通过低成本接收器解码,人们可以从SBAS接收增强数据,稍微修改它以适应GBAS数据结构并将此数据广播到配备GBAS的飞机。所述飞机可以使用航道性能和垂直制导(LPV)最终进近段执行RNP进近,否则将不可用。这在没有发布非精确最小值的地方可能特别方便,例如Innsbruck和Salzburg的RNP-E方法。由于两个系统之间存在细微差异,因此我们确保了生命安全进近服务的完整性。我们将该系统命名为GLASS(使用SbaS的GLS方法),建立了一个原型并使用真实的GBAS航空电子硬件进行了测试。我们在奥地利萨尔茨堡机场进行了4次进近。萨尔茨堡机场现在配备了仅在15号跑道使用LPV的RNP进近,其最小LNAV值明显低于RNP进近,称为RNP E 15。这是由于新的错过的进近点的位置。使用GLASS系统,所有配备GLS系统的飞机都将能够利用这条新的最小线。我们使用FMS引导跟踪进近轨迹,并记录了Collins GLU925多模接收机(MMR)的arinc429输出。在电子飞行袋显示器上提供了GLASS制导以供飞行员参考。我们展示了完整的完整性数据分析,MMR状态信息和MMR输出指导。我们将MMR的GLS数据与机载Septentrio PolaRx3接收器的标准SBAS数据进行了比较。GLASS系统为仅装备gls的飞机(如波音737-800)提供LPV最终进近段。这可以增加到目前没有配备xLS类型方法的机场,如因斯布鲁克机场(LOWI)。特别是在法国,这种方法可能会引起人们的兴趣,因为法国政府已经正式宣布退役所有I类ILS装置,转而采用RNP方法和LPV。系统也可以在机载侧携带,而不是在地面上固定安装。有了飞行员可选择的FAS模块,它可以在不修改现有机载硬件的情况下实现LPV方法。因此,任何具备GLS能力的飞机都可以在不需要修改地面基础设施的情况下进行LPV进近。在这种情况下,来自GBAS的保护级别缩放不是问题,因为它可以由GLASS系统补偿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信