Are Information-Centric Networks Video-Ready?

Christos Tsilopoulos, G. Xylomenos, George C. Polyzos
{"title":"Are Information-Centric Networks Video-Ready?","authors":"Christos Tsilopoulos, G. Xylomenos, George C. Polyzos","doi":"10.1109/PV.2013.6691438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Video constitutes the majority of all Internet traffic and its share is expected to grow. Any future Internet architecture with a chance at success should provide some tangible benefits for video applications. Information-Centric Networking (ICN) architectures were designed with the specific goal of improving content distribution on the Internet; thus, this paper attempts to answer the obvious question: is ICN appropriate and ready for video traffic and, if not, what is missing or should be modified? To this end, we consider two different ICN architectures, ContentCentric Networking (CCN) and Publish-Subscribe Internetworking (PSI), and examine their applicability to Video on Demand and Live Video Streaming applications. Our goal is to clarify what ICN already does well for video, what it still needs to do, and, most importantly, what it could or should do differently.","PeriodicalId":289244,"journal":{"name":"2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop","volume":"156 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 20th International Packet Video Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PV.2013.6691438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Video constitutes the majority of all Internet traffic and its share is expected to grow. Any future Internet architecture with a chance at success should provide some tangible benefits for video applications. Information-Centric Networking (ICN) architectures were designed with the specific goal of improving content distribution on the Internet; thus, this paper attempts to answer the obvious question: is ICN appropriate and ready for video traffic and, if not, what is missing or should be modified? To this end, we consider two different ICN architectures, ContentCentric Networking (CCN) and Publish-Subscribe Internetworking (PSI), and examine their applicability to Video on Demand and Live Video Streaming applications. Our goal is to clarify what ICN already does well for video, what it still needs to do, and, most importantly, what it could or should do differently.
以信息为中心的网络视频准备好了吗?
视频构成了所有互联网流量的大部分,其份额预计还会增长。任何未来有机会成功的互联网架构都应该为视频应用程序提供一些切实的好处。信息中心网络(ICN)体系结构的设计目标是改善互联网上的内容分发;因此,本文试图回答一个显而易见的问题:ICN是否适合视频流量,是否准备好了,如果不是,缺少什么或应该修改什么?为此,我们考虑了两种不同的ICN架构,内容中心网络(CCN)和发布-订阅互联网(PSI),并研究了它们在视频点播和实时视频流应用中的适用性。我们的目标是澄清ICN在视频方面已经做得很好,它还需要做什么,最重要的是,它可以或应该做些什么不同的事情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信