Problems of training specialists in the field of digital transformation: The experience of Russia

E. Romanov
{"title":"Problems of training specialists in the field of digital transformation: The experience of Russia","authors":"E. Romanov","doi":"10.17853/1994-5639-2022-10-64-102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The structural reorganisation of the Russian economy will require a revision of approaches to training specialists in the field of information technology in the context of the “war for talents” unfolded in the world. HR digital revolution (digital transformation) is one of the conditions for Russia’s breakthrough into the sixth technological order to ensure digital sovereignty in Russia.Aim. On the basis of identifying significant problems in the adaptability of the Russian higher education system to provide national economy with personnel, the present research aimed to formulate approaches to the strategy aimed at determining the number of university admission quotas in training programmes related to digital transformation.The literature highlights two serious problems regarding the policy of distribution of admission quotas for higher education programmes: 1) the allocated admission quotas for the most part do not correspond to the structure of the regional economy; 2) violation of the norm of the number of students per 10 thousand of the population aged 17 to 30 years, as a result, in some regions, the number of school graduates significantly exceeds the number of budget places in universities. The hypothesis of the study consists in the assumption that the policy of distribution of admission quotas for training in higher education programmes is flexible, providing for an increase in enrolment for training in areas related to information and communication technologies with an increase in “demand” for training in these areas.Methodology and research methods. The work was carried out on the basis of a systematic approach. Theoretical research methods (methods-operations) were used: analysis (literature on the research problem, normative documents), comparison and generalisation, induction, synthesis. The main theoretical method-action was the inductive-deductive method. At the first stage of the study, the analysis of the number of students enrolled for full-time study (computer science and computer engineering) at the expense of federal budget allocations (period 2016–2021) was carried out. As a result of data generalisation in certain areas of training and comparative analysis of the number of applicants with the allocated admission quotas, the discrepancy (gap) between compared values was established. At the second stage of the research, similar methods were used in areas related to computer and information sciences and information security to confirm the systemic nature of the identified phenomenon.Results and scientific novelty. Based on the analysis of the admissions (period 2016– 2021) to the specialities related to information technology (computer science and computer engineering, computer and information science, information security), the author has identified a gap between admission to the university and admission quotas. The essence of this gap is that in the analysed areas of training, the number of full-time students accepted for full-time education at the expense of federal budget allocations is significantly lower than the volume of allocated admission quotas. Thus, according to the enlarged groups of specialities (EGS) “Computer Science and Computer Engineering”, the number of accepted undergraduate and graduate programmes was less than the allocated admission quotas for 37519 university places (17075 + 20444); the gap in the speciality “Computer and Information Sciences” (bachelor degree programme + master degree programme) was 3584 (1722 + 1862); “Information Security” (bachelor degree programme + specialist degree programme) – 4082 (1393 + 2689). The possible causes of the gap are analysed and proposals are formulated to improve the institutional provision of training for digital transformation.Practical significance. The research results can be used to adjust the strategy for the development of scientific and educational sphere.","PeriodicalId":278157,"journal":{"name":"The Education and science journal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Education and science journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2022-10-64-102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The structural reorganisation of the Russian economy will require a revision of approaches to training specialists in the field of information technology in the context of the “war for talents” unfolded in the world. HR digital revolution (digital transformation) is one of the conditions for Russia’s breakthrough into the sixth technological order to ensure digital sovereignty in Russia.Aim. On the basis of identifying significant problems in the adaptability of the Russian higher education system to provide national economy with personnel, the present research aimed to formulate approaches to the strategy aimed at determining the number of university admission quotas in training programmes related to digital transformation.The literature highlights two serious problems regarding the policy of distribution of admission quotas for higher education programmes: 1) the allocated admission quotas for the most part do not correspond to the structure of the regional economy; 2) violation of the norm of the number of students per 10 thousand of the population aged 17 to 30 years, as a result, in some regions, the number of school graduates significantly exceeds the number of budget places in universities. The hypothesis of the study consists in the assumption that the policy of distribution of admission quotas for training in higher education programmes is flexible, providing for an increase in enrolment for training in areas related to information and communication technologies with an increase in “demand” for training in these areas.Methodology and research methods. The work was carried out on the basis of a systematic approach. Theoretical research methods (methods-operations) were used: analysis (literature on the research problem, normative documents), comparison and generalisation, induction, synthesis. The main theoretical method-action was the inductive-deductive method. At the first stage of the study, the analysis of the number of students enrolled for full-time study (computer science and computer engineering) at the expense of federal budget allocations (period 2016–2021) was carried out. As a result of data generalisation in certain areas of training and comparative analysis of the number of applicants with the allocated admission quotas, the discrepancy (gap) between compared values was established. At the second stage of the research, similar methods were used in areas related to computer and information sciences and information security to confirm the systemic nature of the identified phenomenon.Results and scientific novelty. Based on the analysis of the admissions (period 2016– 2021) to the specialities related to information technology (computer science and computer engineering, computer and information science, information security), the author has identified a gap between admission to the university and admission quotas. The essence of this gap is that in the analysed areas of training, the number of full-time students accepted for full-time education at the expense of federal budget allocations is significantly lower than the volume of allocated admission quotas. Thus, according to the enlarged groups of specialities (EGS) “Computer Science and Computer Engineering”, the number of accepted undergraduate and graduate programmes was less than the allocated admission quotas for 37519 university places (17075 + 20444); the gap in the speciality “Computer and Information Sciences” (bachelor degree programme + master degree programme) was 3584 (1722 + 1862); “Information Security” (bachelor degree programme + specialist degree programme) – 4082 (1393 + 2689). The possible causes of the gap are analysed and proposals are formulated to improve the institutional provision of training for digital transformation.Practical significance. The research results can be used to adjust the strategy for the development of scientific and educational sphere.
数字化转型领域专家培训的问题:俄罗斯的经验
介绍。俄罗斯经济的结构重组将要求在世界“人才争夺战”展开的背景下,修改信息技术领域专家的培训方法。人力资源数字化革命(数字化转型)是俄罗斯突破第六次技术秩序,确保俄罗斯数字主权的条件之一。在确定俄罗斯高等教育系统为国民经济提供人才的适应性方面存在的重大问题的基础上,本研究旨在制定旨在确定与数字化转型相关的培训计划中大学入学配额数量的战略方法。文献强调了关于高等教育项目入学配额分配政策的两个严重问题:1)分配的入学配额在很大程度上不符合区域经济结构;2)违反了17岁至30岁人口每万名学生人数的标准,在一些地区,学校毕业生人数明显超过大学预算名额。这项研究的假设是,高等教育方案培训入学名额的分配政策是灵活的,可以增加与信息和通信技术有关领域的培训入学人数,同时增加对这些领域培训的“需求”。方法论和研究方法。这项工作是在系统方法的基础上进行的。采用理论研究方法(方法-操作):分析(研究问题的文献、规范性文件)、比较概括、归纳、综合。主要的理论方法是归纳演绎法。在研究的第一阶段,以联邦预算拨款(2016-2021年)为代价,对全日制学习(计算机科学和计算机工程)的学生人数进行了分析。由于对某些培训领域的数据进行了归纳,并对已分配入学名额的申请人人数进行了比较分析,因此确定了比较值之间的差异(差距)。在研究的第二阶段,类似的方法被用于与计算机和信息科学以及信息安全相关的领域,以确认所识别现象的系统性质。结果与科学新颖性。通过对2016 - 2021年信息技术相关专业(计算机科学与计算机工程、计算机与信息科学、信息安全)招生情况的分析,发现我校录取率与招生定额之间存在差距。这一差距的实质是,在所分析的培训领域,以联邦预算拨款为代价接受全日制教育的全日制学生人数大大低于分配的入学配额。因此,按扩大的专业组别“计算机科学及计算机工程”计算,获接纳的本科及研究生课程数目少于分配的37519个大学学额(17075 + 20444);“计算机与信息科学”专业(学士学位课程+硕士学位课程)的缺口为3584 (1722 + 1862);“资讯保安”(学士学位课程+专科学位课程)- 4082(1393 + 2689)。分析了造成差距的可能原因,并提出了改善数字化转型培训机构提供的建议。现实意义。研究结果可为我国科教事业发展战略的调整提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信