Memahami Konflik Bougainville di Papua Nugini: Analisis Kronologi, Aktor, Motivasi dan Penyebab Konflik

Paulus R.T. Paramma, M. Lewuk, Robinhot Sagala, Imelda Elosak
{"title":"Memahami Konflik Bougainville di Papua Nugini: Analisis Kronologi, Aktor, Motivasi dan Penyebab Konflik","authors":"Paulus R.T. Paramma, M. Lewuk, Robinhot Sagala, Imelda Elosak","doi":"10.31957/pjdir.v1i2.1790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bougainville civil war is perhaps the most protracted conflict, attracting attention from the PNG government and the international community. This article aims to examine the analysis of the conflict in Bougainville between 1988 and 1998, thereby lessons learned can be taken for conflict prevention worldwide today. This study used a model analysis approach introduced by Fisher et al. and popularized by Lisa Schrich, namely when (timeline), why (motivation), who (actor), and what (cause and effect). The results indicate: 1) PNG government failed to anticipate unexpected events; 2) several factors contributed to the Bougainville conflict, including the division of the colonies and the geographical location of Bougainville, cultural differences and the identity of the Bougainvillean people, economic factors, inequality in mining distribution; 3) the main actors identified were the PNG Government, BCL, and BRA as parties to the conflict, while actors determined to defuse the conflict in Bougainville included the United Nations, Australia, New Zealand, and women's groups; 4) PNG is a sovereign state interested in political and economic control, while the BRA demands participation, freedom, and justice.KEYWORDSBougainville Conflict; Bougainville Revolutionary Army; Papua New Guinea","PeriodicalId":360018,"journal":{"name":"Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31957/pjdir.v1i2.1790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Bougainville civil war is perhaps the most protracted conflict, attracting attention from the PNG government and the international community. This article aims to examine the analysis of the conflict in Bougainville between 1988 and 1998, thereby lessons learned can be taken for conflict prevention worldwide today. This study used a model analysis approach introduced by Fisher et al. and popularized by Lisa Schrich, namely when (timeline), why (motivation), who (actor), and what (cause and effect). The results indicate: 1) PNG government failed to anticipate unexpected events; 2) several factors contributed to the Bougainville conflict, including the division of the colonies and the geographical location of Bougainville, cultural differences and the identity of the Bougainvillean people, economic factors, inequality in mining distribution; 3) the main actors identified were the PNG Government, BCL, and BRA as parties to the conflict, while actors determined to defuse the conflict in Bougainville included the United Nations, Australia, New Zealand, and women's groups; 4) PNG is a sovereign state interested in political and economic control, while the BRA demands participation, freedom, and justice.KEYWORDSBougainville Conflict; Bougainville Revolutionary Army; Papua New Guinea
了解巴布亚新几内亚的布干维尔冲突:年表、演员、冲突的动机和原因的分析
布干维尔内战可能是最持久的冲突,吸引了巴新政府和国际社会的关注。本文旨在审查对1988年至1998年布干维尔冲突的分析,从而吸取经验教训,供当今世界预防冲突之用。本研究采用了Fisher等人提出并由Lisa Schrich推广的模型分析方法,即when (timeline), why (motivation), who (actor), what (cause and effect)。结果表明:1)巴布亚新几内亚政府未能预见到突发事件;2)导致布干维尔冲突的几个因素,包括殖民地的分裂和布干维尔的地理位置、文化差异和布干维尔人民的认同、经济因素、采矿分配的不平等;3)被确定为冲突各方的主要行为体是巴布亚新几内亚政府、BCL和BRA,而决心化解布干维尔冲突的行为体包括联合国、澳大利亚、新西兰和妇女团体;4) PNG是一个主权国家,对政治和经济控制感兴趣,而BRA要求参与,自由和正义。KEYWORDSBougainville冲突;布干维尔革命军;巴布亚新几内亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信