Paulus R.T. Paramma, M. Lewuk, Robinhot Sagala, Imelda Elosak
{"title":"Memahami Konflik Bougainville di Papua Nugini: Analisis Kronologi, Aktor, Motivasi dan Penyebab Konflik","authors":"Paulus R.T. Paramma, M. Lewuk, Robinhot Sagala, Imelda Elosak","doi":"10.31957/pjdir.v1i2.1790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Bougainville civil war is perhaps the most protracted conflict, attracting attention from the PNG government and the international community. This article aims to examine the analysis of the conflict in Bougainville between 1988 and 1998, thereby lessons learned can be taken for conflict prevention worldwide today. This study used a model analysis approach introduced by Fisher et al. and popularized by Lisa Schrich, namely when (timeline), why (motivation), who (actor), and what (cause and effect). The results indicate: 1) PNG government failed to anticipate unexpected events; 2) several factors contributed to the Bougainville conflict, including the division of the colonies and the geographical location of Bougainville, cultural differences and the identity of the Bougainvillean people, economic factors, inequality in mining distribution; 3) the main actors identified were the PNG Government, BCL, and BRA as parties to the conflict, while actors determined to defuse the conflict in Bougainville included the United Nations, Australia, New Zealand, and women's groups; 4) PNG is a sovereign state interested in political and economic control, while the BRA demands participation, freedom, and justice.KEYWORDSBougainville Conflict; Bougainville Revolutionary Army; Papua New Guinea","PeriodicalId":360018,"journal":{"name":"Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations","volume":"149 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Papua Journal of Diplomacy and International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31957/pjdir.v1i2.1790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The Bougainville civil war is perhaps the most protracted conflict, attracting attention from the PNG government and the international community. This article aims to examine the analysis of the conflict in Bougainville between 1988 and 1998, thereby lessons learned can be taken for conflict prevention worldwide today. This study used a model analysis approach introduced by Fisher et al. and popularized by Lisa Schrich, namely when (timeline), why (motivation), who (actor), and what (cause and effect). The results indicate: 1) PNG government failed to anticipate unexpected events; 2) several factors contributed to the Bougainville conflict, including the division of the colonies and the geographical location of Bougainville, cultural differences and the identity of the Bougainvillean people, economic factors, inequality in mining distribution; 3) the main actors identified were the PNG Government, BCL, and BRA as parties to the conflict, while actors determined to defuse the conflict in Bougainville included the United Nations, Australia, New Zealand, and women's groups; 4) PNG is a sovereign state interested in political and economic control, while the BRA demands participation, freedom, and justice.KEYWORDSBougainville Conflict; Bougainville Revolutionary Army; Papua New Guinea
布干维尔内战可能是最持久的冲突,吸引了巴新政府和国际社会的关注。本文旨在审查对1988年至1998年布干维尔冲突的分析,从而吸取经验教训,供当今世界预防冲突之用。本研究采用了Fisher等人提出并由Lisa Schrich推广的模型分析方法,即when (timeline), why (motivation), who (actor), what (cause and effect)。结果表明:1)巴布亚新几内亚政府未能预见到突发事件;2)导致布干维尔冲突的几个因素,包括殖民地的分裂和布干维尔的地理位置、文化差异和布干维尔人民的认同、经济因素、采矿分配的不平等;3)被确定为冲突各方的主要行为体是巴布亚新几内亚政府、BCL和BRA,而决心化解布干维尔冲突的行为体包括联合国、澳大利亚、新西兰和妇女团体;4) PNG是一个主权国家,对政治和经济控制感兴趣,而BRA要求参与,自由和正义。KEYWORDSBougainville冲突;布干维尔革命军;巴布亚新几内亚