Philosophy of religion F. Schleiermacher in the works of representatives of the theological academies of the late 19th — early 20th century: the concept of religious experience

Nadezhda Koreneva
{"title":"Philosophy of religion F. Schleiermacher in the works of representatives of the theological academies of the late 19th — early 20th century: the concept of religious experience","authors":"Nadezhda Koreneva","doi":"10.15382/sturi2023105.69-82","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The concept of religious feeling in the beginning XX century Russian thinkers dealing with the philosophy of religion are increasingly becoming the focus of attention, but the meaning of this concept is often not explicated, which makes it necessary to study the sources of this concept, one of which (the most important) are the works of F. Schleiermacher. This article is devoted to the analysis of the perception of his concept of religious feeling in theological academies: spiritual and academic periodicals, individual works on the philosophy of religion and textbooks of basic theology (apologetics) are considered. Basically, Schleirmacher's ideas are criticized, there are several ways to understand the \"religious feeling\": a number of authors adhere to the position of G.V.F. Hegel, feeling is considered by them as something secondary to reason and will (V.D. Kudryavtsev-Platonov, Proto. T. Butkevich); the concept of religious feeling can also be understood in a negative way as the aestheticization of religion (N.M. Bogolyubov, D.S. Leonardov, etc.), but most often the concept of religious feeling by Schleiermacher is understood as psychologism, as the subjectivization of religion, excluding the concept of revelation (S.A. Ornatsky, F. Aleksinsky, etc.). Finally, representatives of theological academies, whose works were written already at the beginning of the XX century, share the point of view of V. Dilthey, giving a fundamentally new interpretation of the concept of religious feeling as a pre-rational unity of consciousness (S.S. Glagolev). Finally, the author of the article concludes about the philosophical productivity of the considered interpretations of the concept of \"religious feeling\", and also briefly characterizes its significance for the Russian philosophy of the period in question as a whole.","PeriodicalId":407912,"journal":{"name":"St. Tikhons' University Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"St. Tikhons' University Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15382/sturi2023105.69-82","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The concept of religious feeling in the beginning XX century Russian thinkers dealing with the philosophy of religion are increasingly becoming the focus of attention, but the meaning of this concept is often not explicated, which makes it necessary to study the sources of this concept, one of which (the most important) are the works of F. Schleiermacher. This article is devoted to the analysis of the perception of his concept of religious feeling in theological academies: spiritual and academic periodicals, individual works on the philosophy of religion and textbooks of basic theology (apologetics) are considered. Basically, Schleirmacher's ideas are criticized, there are several ways to understand the "religious feeling": a number of authors adhere to the position of G.V.F. Hegel, feeling is considered by them as something secondary to reason and will (V.D. Kudryavtsev-Platonov, Proto. T. Butkevich); the concept of religious feeling can also be understood in a negative way as the aestheticization of religion (N.M. Bogolyubov, D.S. Leonardov, etc.), but most often the concept of religious feeling by Schleiermacher is understood as psychologism, as the subjectivization of religion, excluding the concept of revelation (S.A. Ornatsky, F. Aleksinsky, etc.). Finally, representatives of theological academies, whose works were written already at the beginning of the XX century, share the point of view of V. Dilthey, giving a fundamentally new interpretation of the concept of religious feeling as a pre-rational unity of consciousness (S.S. Glagolev). Finally, the author of the article concludes about the philosophical productivity of the considered interpretations of the concept of "religious feeling", and also briefly characterizes its significance for the Russian philosophy of the period in question as a whole.
宗教哲学F.施莱尔马赫在19世纪末至20世纪初神学院代表的著作中:宗教经验的概念
二十世纪初俄罗斯思想家处理宗教哲学的宗教情感概念日益成为人们关注的焦点,但这一概念的含义往往没有得到阐明,这就有必要研究这一概念的来源,其中(最重要的)是F.施莱尔马赫(F. Schleiermacher)的著作。本文分析了神学院对他的宗教情感概念的理解,包括精神和学术期刊、宗教哲学个人著作和基础神学(护教学)教科书。基本上,施莱马赫的观点受到了批评,有几种理解“宗教情感”的方式:一些作者坚持G.V.F.黑格尔的立场,他们认为情感是仅次于理性和意志的东西(V.D. Kudryavtsev-Platonov, Proto)。t . Butkevich);宗教情感的概念也可以被消极地理解为宗教的审美化(N.M. Bogolyubov, D.S. Leonardov等),但大多数情况下,施莱尔马赫的宗教情感概念被理解为心理主义,作为宗教的主体化,排除了启示的概念(S.A. Ornatsky, F. Aleksinsky等)。最后,神学院的代表们,他们的作品在20世纪初就已经写好了,他们分享了狄尔泰的观点,对宗教情感作为意识的前理性统一的概念给出了全新的解释(S.S. Glagolev)。最后,本文作者总结了对“宗教情感”概念的思考性解释的哲学生产力,并简要地描述了它对所涉时期整个俄罗斯哲学的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信