Post-secularism in modern Russia: dangers and prospects

Lyubov V. Denisova, Andrey Morozov
{"title":"Post-secularism in modern Russia: dangers and prospects","authors":"Lyubov V. Denisova, Andrey Morozov","doi":"10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-2-0-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is based on the discussion of the concepts of \"post-secular so- ciety\" and \"post-secularism\" discussed in the social sciences and the possibility of their use for analyzing the processes taking place in modern Russian society. A number of serious Russian scientists, researchers of religious processes, express objections to the use of the concepts of \"post-secular society\", \"post-secularism\", considering the ongo- ing processes to be a continuation of secularization. Analyzing their arguments, the authors come to the conclusion that there is no reason to talk about the existence of a post-secular society in modern Russia. However, post-secularism as a communicative phenomenon with a normative perspective is quite an actual and empirically verifiable concept. Such fixed phenomena as reconfiguration, demarginalization of religion, in- terfaith competition, interfaith cooperation are new forms of public relations that can- not be evaluated as the results of either secularization or desecularization. The emer- gence of postsecular quality of communication creates conditions for the establishment of fundamentally new forms of relations between various ideological groups, as well as for the transformation of state-confessional relations. The formation of post-secular public relations creates both dangers and new prospects. The dangers are connected with the contradictions arising in connection with the return of religion to the public environment. Thus, the reconfiguration may threaten the clericalization of public life. At the same time, the demarginalization of religion is a condition for public dialogue between representatives of different ideological positions.","PeriodicalId":277801,"journal":{"name":"Research Result Sociology and Management","volume":"268 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Result Sociology and Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18413/2408-9338-2023-9-2-0-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is based on the discussion of the concepts of "post-secular so- ciety" and "post-secularism" discussed in the social sciences and the possibility of their use for analyzing the processes taking place in modern Russian society. A number of serious Russian scientists, researchers of religious processes, express objections to the use of the concepts of "post-secular society", "post-secularism", considering the ongo- ing processes to be a continuation of secularization. Analyzing their arguments, the authors come to the conclusion that there is no reason to talk about the existence of a post-secular society in modern Russia. However, post-secularism as a communicative phenomenon with a normative perspective is quite an actual and empirically verifiable concept. Such fixed phenomena as reconfiguration, demarginalization of religion, in- terfaith competition, interfaith cooperation are new forms of public relations that can- not be evaluated as the results of either secularization or desecularization. The emer- gence of postsecular quality of communication creates conditions for the establishment of fundamentally new forms of relations between various ideological groups, as well as for the transformation of state-confessional relations. The formation of post-secular public relations creates both dangers and new prospects. The dangers are connected with the contradictions arising in connection with the return of religion to the public environment. Thus, the reconfiguration may threaten the clericalization of public life. At the same time, the demarginalization of religion is a condition for public dialogue between representatives of different ideological positions.
现代俄罗斯的后世俗主义:危险与前景
本文基于对社会科学中所讨论的“后世俗社会”和“后世俗主义”概念的讨论,以及它们用于分析现代俄罗斯社会发生的过程的可能性。一些严肃的俄罗斯科学家、宗教进程研究人员对使用“后世俗社会”、“后世俗主义”等概念表示反对,认为正在进行的进程是世俗化的延续。分析他们的论点,作者得出结论,没有理由在现代俄罗斯谈论后世俗社会的存在。然而,后世俗主义作为一种具有规范性视角的交际现象,是一个相当现实和经验可验证的概念。诸如宗教的重新配置、去边缘化、不同信仰间的竞争、不同信仰间的合作等固定现象是公共关系的新形式,既不能被评价为世俗化的结果,也不能被评价为非世俗化的结果。传播的后世俗性的出现,为各种意识形态群体之间建立全新的关系形式创造了条件,也为国家-忏悔关系的转变创造了条件。后世俗公共关系的形成既带来了危险,也带来了新的前景。这些危险与宗教回归公共环境所产生的矛盾有关。因此,这种重新配置可能会威胁到公共生活的官僚化。同时,宗教的去边缘化是不同意识形态立场的代表之间进行公开对话的条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信