Community Dialogues

P. Determeyer, Jerome W Crowder
{"title":"Community Dialogues","authors":"P. Determeyer, Jerome W Crowder","doi":"10.1093/med/9780190918514.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Community dialogues provide a method of determining viewpoints and values for representative populations and also offer a means for educating and empowering participants on the topic being discussed. Dialogue participants take the information that is gleaned from the research and use it to make changes that will affect their families and broader community members. In the conduct of dialogues, research becomes a two-way street: researchers and participants both gather information, with the former collecting data about values and beliefs about a topic and the latter acquiring knowledge regarding a topic to deliver to their communities and serve as a catalyst for further conversation and change. The technique is particularly well-suited for complex topics where some education is needed about the different perspectives being researched. The researchers go beyond the normal data-gathering and analyzing functions to assist participants in identifying potential avenues for implementing policy changes.","PeriodicalId":377009,"journal":{"name":"Research Methods in Health Humanities","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research Methods in Health Humanities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/med/9780190918514.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community dialogues provide a method of determining viewpoints and values for representative populations and also offer a means for educating and empowering participants on the topic being discussed. Dialogue participants take the information that is gleaned from the research and use it to make changes that will affect their families and broader community members. In the conduct of dialogues, research becomes a two-way street: researchers and participants both gather information, with the former collecting data about values and beliefs about a topic and the latter acquiring knowledge regarding a topic to deliver to their communities and serve as a catalyst for further conversation and change. The technique is particularly well-suited for complex topics where some education is needed about the different perspectives being researched. The researchers go beyond the normal data-gathering and analyzing functions to assist participants in identifying potential avenues for implementing policy changes.
社区的对话
社区对话提供了一种确定代表性人群的观点和价值观的方法,也提供了一种就所讨论的主题对参与者进行教育和授权的手段。对话参与者从研究中收集信息,并利用这些信息做出改变,从而影响到他们的家庭和更广泛的社区成员。在对话的过程中,研究变成了一条双向的道路:研究人员和参与者都在收集信息,前者收集关于一个话题的价值观和信念的数据,后者获取关于一个话题的知识,并将其传递给他们的社区,并作为进一步对话和改变的催化剂。这种技术特别适合于需要从不同角度进行研究的复杂主题。研究人员超越了正常的数据收集和分析功能,以帮助参与者确定实施政策变化的潜在途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信