The Mortgaged Miracle Social Stratification in Contemporary Estonian Cinema

Dirk Hoyer
{"title":"The Mortgaged Miracle Social Stratification in Contemporary Estonian Cinema","authors":"Dirk Hoyer","doi":"10.2478/bsmr-2022-0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract According to recent OECD statistics, Estonia is the European Union country with the highest income inequalities. Among all the ex-Warsaw bloc states, the Baltic country also has the highest household debt. Despite these dire socio-economic indicators, Estonia’s path to economic development, the adaptation of the purest forms of neoliberalism to be found in Europe, is often hailed among economists. Former prime minister Mart Laar, one of the key architects of what was dubbed by some the Estonian Economic Miracle, admitted that his guideline for the post-Soviet economic reform (and the only book he read on economics) was Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose. How does inequality, social exclusion and growing social stratification manifest itself in Estonian contemporary cinema? The debut films of three directors, Vallo Toomla, Mihkel Ulk and Toomas Hussar, which all have a contemporary setting, address the neoliberal transformation process to various degrees. All three debut films are genre films: Mushrooming (Hussar, 2012) is a comedy, Zero Point (Ulk, 2014) a high-school drama and The Pretenders (Toomla, 2016) a thriller. None of the films directly addresses the social stratification of Estonian society. The films engage the subject with a low level of politicization, yet each of the films is a chronotope of the engagement of the film medium with society. Especially the question of individual responsibility to society, accountability for social exclusion and possible alternatives to neoliberalism are either addressed in an apprehensive way or, through their absence, deemed irrelevant. How did Friedman’s claim that economic freedom equals political freedom, that the market is the only effective tool and that self-interest is the only acceptable driving force in society affect the Estonian cinemascape? This article argues that the chronotope of contemporary cinema in the small Baltic country is an outopia, a no-place, in which alternatives to the status quo have no more reference points. The outopian outlook on society is manifested either by an absence in the belief of the integrity of politics and media (Mushrooming), by an implicit acceptance of social exclusion (Zero Point) or by the acknowledgement that faking material wealth is the only tool for maintaining social relationships (The Pretenders).","PeriodicalId":253522,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Screen Media Review","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Screen Media Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/bsmr-2022-0012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract According to recent OECD statistics, Estonia is the European Union country with the highest income inequalities. Among all the ex-Warsaw bloc states, the Baltic country also has the highest household debt. Despite these dire socio-economic indicators, Estonia’s path to economic development, the adaptation of the purest forms of neoliberalism to be found in Europe, is often hailed among economists. Former prime minister Mart Laar, one of the key architects of what was dubbed by some the Estonian Economic Miracle, admitted that his guideline for the post-Soviet economic reform (and the only book he read on economics) was Milton Friedman’s Free to Choose. How does inequality, social exclusion and growing social stratification manifest itself in Estonian contemporary cinema? The debut films of three directors, Vallo Toomla, Mihkel Ulk and Toomas Hussar, which all have a contemporary setting, address the neoliberal transformation process to various degrees. All three debut films are genre films: Mushrooming (Hussar, 2012) is a comedy, Zero Point (Ulk, 2014) a high-school drama and The Pretenders (Toomla, 2016) a thriller. None of the films directly addresses the social stratification of Estonian society. The films engage the subject with a low level of politicization, yet each of the films is a chronotope of the engagement of the film medium with society. Especially the question of individual responsibility to society, accountability for social exclusion and possible alternatives to neoliberalism are either addressed in an apprehensive way or, through their absence, deemed irrelevant. How did Friedman’s claim that economic freedom equals political freedom, that the market is the only effective tool and that self-interest is the only acceptable driving force in society affect the Estonian cinemascape? This article argues that the chronotope of contemporary cinema in the small Baltic country is an outopia, a no-place, in which alternatives to the status quo have no more reference points. The outopian outlook on society is manifested either by an absence in the belief of the integrity of politics and media (Mushrooming), by an implicit acceptance of social exclusion (Zero Point) or by the acknowledgement that faking material wealth is the only tool for maintaining social relationships (The Pretenders).
当代爱沙尼亚电影中的社会分层
根据经合组织最近的统计数据,爱沙尼亚是欧盟国家中收入不平等最严重的国家。在所有前华沙集团国家中,这个波罗的海国家的家庭债务也是最高的。尽管有这些可怕的社会经济指标,爱沙尼亚的经济发展之路——对欧洲最纯粹的新自由主义的适应——经常受到经济学家的称赞。爱沙尼亚前总理马尔•拉尔(Mart Laar)被一些人称为“爱沙尼亚经济奇迹”的主要缔造者之一,他承认,他对后苏联经济改革的指导(也是他读过的唯一一本经济学书籍)是米尔顿•弗里德曼(Milton Friedman)的《自由选择》(Free to Choose)。不平等、社会排斥和日益增长的社会分层是如何在爱沙尼亚当代电影中表现出来的?三位导演瓦洛·图姆拉、米克尔·乌尔克和托马斯·胡萨尔的处女作都以当代为背景,在不同程度上讲述了新自由主义的转型过程。这三部处女作都是类型片:《蘑菇》(Hussar, 2012)是喜剧,《零点》(Ulk, 2014)是高中剧情片,《伪装者》(Toomla, 2016)是惊悚片。没有一部电影直接涉及爱沙尼亚社会的社会分层。这些电影以低水平的政治化参与主题,但每部电影都是电影媒介与社会参与的计时器。特别是个人对社会的责任,对社会排斥的责任以及新自由主义的可能替代方案的问题,要么以一种令人担忧的方式解决,要么因其缺席而被视为无关紧要。弗里德曼声称经济自由等于政治自由,市场是唯一有效的工具,个人利益是社会中唯一可接受的驱动力,这些言论是如何影响爱沙尼亚的电影环境的?本文认为,这个波罗的海小国的当代电影的时钟是一个乌托邦,一个没有的地方,在这个地方,对现状的替代没有更多的参考点。乌托邦式的社会观要么表现为不相信政治和媒体的完整性(《迅速成长》),要么表现为含蓄地接受社会排斥(《零点》),要么表现为承认伪造物质财富是维持社会关系的唯一工具(《伪装者》)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信