Proposal of New Code Case for Alternative UT Flaw Evaluation and Acceptance Criteria of Subsurface Flaw Near Component Surface in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3
{"title":"Proposal of New Code Case for Alternative UT Flaw Evaluation and Acceptance Criteria of Subsurface Flaw Near Component Surface in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3","authors":"S. Terada","doi":"10.1115/pvp2019-93105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The current proximity rules for subsurface flaws near the surfaces of component in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3 are different from those of Section XI. The current acceptance criteria of Sec. XI were revised in 2008 in order to eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws based on the research work by Dr. K. Hasegawa and Dr. K. Miyazaki el. The fracture mechanics evaluation for the current and proposed alternative acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near a component’s surfaces based on Section XI have been performed. The stress intensity factors for transformed surface flaws of the current acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near component’s surfaces are much larger and too conservative compared with the overall acceptance criteria. It is confirmed herein that the proposed alternative converting rules have enough fracture margin. Therefore, the safety level of this proposal is almost the same as that of the current code. The proposed alternative acceptance criteria may avoid unnecessary weld repairs, and eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws in the area near the component’s surface.","PeriodicalId":174920,"journal":{"name":"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 5: High-Pressure Technology; Rudy Scavuzzo Student Paper Symposium and 27th Annual Student Paper Competition; ASME Nondestructive Evaluation, Diagnosis and Prognosis Division (NDPD)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/pvp2019-93105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The current proximity rules for subsurface flaws near the surfaces of component in Section VIII Division 2 and Division 3 are different from those of Section XI. The current acceptance criteria of Sec. XI were revised in 2008 in order to eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws based on the research work by Dr. K. Hasegawa and Dr. K. Miyazaki el. The fracture mechanics evaluation for the current and proposed alternative acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near a component’s surfaces based on Section XI have been performed. The stress intensity factors for transformed surface flaws of the current acceptance criteria for subsurface flaws near component’s surfaces are much larger and too conservative compared with the overall acceptance criteria. It is confirmed herein that the proposed alternative converting rules have enough fracture margin. Therefore, the safety level of this proposal is almost the same as that of the current code. The proposed alternative acceptance criteria may avoid unnecessary weld repairs, and eliminate the discontinuity of acceptable and unacceptable flaws in the area near the component’s surface.
基于Dr. Hasegawa和Dr. K. Miyazaki el的研究工作,为了消除可接受和不可接受缺陷的不连续性,现行的第11章可接受标准于2008年进行了修订。现行构件表面亚表面缺陷验收标准中变形表面缺陷的应力强度因子较大,与整体验收标准相比过于保守。验证了所提出的替代转换规则具有足够的断裂裕度。因此,该提案的安全级别与现行规范的安全级别几乎相同。建议的替代验收标准可以避免不必要的焊接修补,并消除部件表面附近区域可接受和不可接受缺陷的不连续性。