Azathioprine and biological treatment genetic association with clinical response and toxicity in inflammatory bowel disease patients.

M. Abdelrahim, Nashwa Eltantawy, Amira B. Kassem, I. Elzayyadi, A. Elberry, Layla M. Salah
{"title":"Azathioprine and biological treatment genetic association with clinical response and toxicity in inflammatory bowel disease patients.","authors":"M. Abdelrahim, Nashwa Eltantawy, Amira B. Kassem, I. Elzayyadi, A. Elberry, Layla M. Salah","doi":"10.21608/bfsa.2023.175286.1580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) involves a variety of conditions, particularly Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). IBD is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process of the patient’s gut. This review aims to summarize the pharmacogenetics of biologics approved for IBD and the correlation with azathioprine-metabolizing enzymes and adverse reactions, therefore highlighting a likely relationship between particular polymorphisms and therapeutic response. Therefore, we reviewed and discussed the activities of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) protocols that use monoclonal antibodies (mABs) with a particular attention to the integration of other actions aimed to exploit the most effective and safest medications for IBD cases. The pharmacotherapy of IBD (CD and UC) has experienced a great advancement with the advent of mABs which have peculiar pharmacokinetic properties differentiating them from chemical agents, like aminosalicylates, antimetabolites (e.g., azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6MP)), and methotrexate), and immunosuppressant agents (steroids and cyclosporine). But clinical studies showed that biologicals might have pharmacokinetic variability which can affect the anticipated clinical outcomes, beyond primary resistance phenomena. Thus, TDM protocols are applied to the doses of medications according to the required serum mABs levels. This aims to maximize the favourable effects of mABs and minimize the toxicity. But, the presence of particular genetic polymorphisms in patients might determine a different outcome in response to treatment, indicating the heterogeneity of the effectiveness among IBD cases. Indeed, many reports demonstrated significant associations between polymorphisms and response to biologics. In conclusion, the improvement of TNF-, TNFR and IL-1 pharmacogenetics could be the best approach toward a targeted treatment for IBD.Pre-therapy genotyping has to be integrated with IBD therapeutic guidelines, as it is the most suitable approach to choose the most appropriate biologicals for each case. Also, the addition of pharmacodynamic markers (including serum, cellular, or tissue concentrations of TNF-alpha and IL-8) might boost the predictive performance of models and, eventually, control the disease with a significant improvement in quality of life (QOL).","PeriodicalId":345040,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Assiut","volume":"53 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Assiut","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bfsa.2023.175286.1580","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) involves a variety of conditions, particularly Crohn’s disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). IBD is characterized by a chronic inflammatory process of the patient’s gut. This review aims to summarize the pharmacogenetics of biologics approved for IBD and the correlation with azathioprine-metabolizing enzymes and adverse reactions, therefore highlighting a likely relationship between particular polymorphisms and therapeutic response. Therefore, we reviewed and discussed the activities of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) protocols that use monoclonal antibodies (mABs) with a particular attention to the integration of other actions aimed to exploit the most effective and safest medications for IBD cases. The pharmacotherapy of IBD (CD and UC) has experienced a great advancement with the advent of mABs which have peculiar pharmacokinetic properties differentiating them from chemical agents, like aminosalicylates, antimetabolites (e.g., azathioprine (AZA), 6-mercaptopurine (6MP)), and methotrexate), and immunosuppressant agents (steroids and cyclosporine). But clinical studies showed that biologicals might have pharmacokinetic variability which can affect the anticipated clinical outcomes, beyond primary resistance phenomena. Thus, TDM protocols are applied to the doses of medications according to the required serum mABs levels. This aims to maximize the favourable effects of mABs and minimize the toxicity. But, the presence of particular genetic polymorphisms in patients might determine a different outcome in response to treatment, indicating the heterogeneity of the effectiveness among IBD cases. Indeed, many reports demonstrated significant associations between polymorphisms and response to biologics. In conclusion, the improvement of TNF-, TNFR and IL-1 pharmacogenetics could be the best approach toward a targeted treatment for IBD.Pre-therapy genotyping has to be integrated with IBD therapeutic guidelines, as it is the most suitable approach to choose the most appropriate biologicals for each case. Also, the addition of pharmacodynamic markers (including serum, cellular, or tissue concentrations of TNF-alpha and IL-8) might boost the predictive performance of models and, eventually, control the disease with a significant improvement in quality of life (QOL).
硫唑嘌呤和生物治疗与炎症性肠病患者临床反应和毒性的遗传关联。
炎症性肠病(IBD)涉及多种疾病,特别是克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)。IBD的特点是患者肠道的慢性炎症过程。本综述旨在总结被批准用于IBD的生物制剂的药物遗传学及其与硫唑嘌呤代谢酶和不良反应的相关性,从而强调特定多态性与治疗反应之间的可能关系。因此,我们回顾并讨论了使用单克隆抗体(mABs)的治疗性药物监测(TDM)方案的活动,并特别关注旨在为IBD患者开发最有效和最安全药物的其他行动的整合。随着单克隆抗体的出现,IBD (CD和UC)的药物治疗经历了巨大的进步,单克隆抗体具有独特的药代动力学特性,将其与化学药物(如氨基水杨酸盐、抗代谢物(如硫唑嘌呤(AZA)、6-巯基嘌呤(6MP)和甲氨蝶呤)和免疫抑制剂(类固醇和环孢素)区分出来。但临床研究表明,除了最初的耐药现象外,生物制剂可能具有药代动力学变异性,这可能会影响预期的临床结果。因此,TDM方案根据所需的血清单克隆抗体水平应用于药物剂量。这是为了最大限度地发挥单克隆抗体的有利作用,并尽量减少毒性。但是,患者中特定遗传多态性的存在可能决定了治疗反应的不同结果,表明IBD病例有效性的异质性。事实上,许多报告证明了多态性和对生物制剂的反应之间的显著关联。总之,提高TNF-、TNF- fr和IL-1的药物遗传学水平可能是IBD靶向治疗的最佳途径。治疗前基因分型必须与IBD治疗指南相结合,因为它是为每个病例选择最合适的生物制剂的最合适方法。此外,添加药理学标记物(包括血清、细胞或组织中tnf - α和IL-8的浓度)可能会提高模型的预测性能,并最终控制疾病,显著改善生活质量(QOL)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信