Identifying Handsaw Tooth Shape Based on the Micro- and Macroscopic Analysis of the Kerf Floor Contour

Heather Greathouse, E. Chapman, A. Maxwell, A. Klales
{"title":"Identifying Handsaw Tooth Shape Based on the Micro- and Macroscopic Analysis of the Kerf Floor Contour","authors":"Heather Greathouse, E. Chapman, A. Maxwell, A. Klales","doi":"10.5744/fa.2020.0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Skeletal trauma analysis is a major facet of forensic anthropology casework and can entail interpretation of sharp force saw trauma. Hand-powered saws are commonly used in cases of dismemberment and analysis requires differentiating class characteristics. Features of the kerf walls and floor provide information utilized in identifying set, shape, size, power, and direction of sawing motion of the tool. The focus of this study is to examine validity and reliability of determining tooth shape class characteristic (rip versus crosscut) from features of the kerf floor. Two crosscut and three rip handsaws, ranging from 6 to 16 teeth per inch, were used to make 30 incomplete cuts per saw for a total of 150 cuts. Each kerf floor was analyzed macroscopically and microscopically using a digital microscope at 30 × magnification by three observers of different experience levels (expert, experienced, and novice). Profile shapes were classified as U-shaped/concave (rip) or W-shaped/convex (crosscut) by each observer for all 150 cuts. Reliability tests using Cohen’s kappa ranged from substantial in the two less experienced observers to almost perfect in pairwise comparisons with the expert. Microscopic classification accuracy was 94.0% (423/450) for all three observers and macroscopic examination increased accuracy to 99.8% (449/450). Saw wear and tooth size were not a significant determiner in correct identification of saw tooth type. Overall, tooth shape can be reliably and accurately determined from incomplete cuts.","PeriodicalId":309775,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Anthropology","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5744/fa.2020.0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skeletal trauma analysis is a major facet of forensic anthropology casework and can entail interpretation of sharp force saw trauma. Hand-powered saws are commonly used in cases of dismemberment and analysis requires differentiating class characteristics. Features of the kerf walls and floor provide information utilized in identifying set, shape, size, power, and direction of sawing motion of the tool. The focus of this study is to examine validity and reliability of determining tooth shape class characteristic (rip versus crosscut) from features of the kerf floor. Two crosscut and three rip handsaws, ranging from 6 to 16 teeth per inch, were used to make 30 incomplete cuts per saw for a total of 150 cuts. Each kerf floor was analyzed macroscopically and microscopically using a digital microscope at 30 × magnification by three observers of different experience levels (expert, experienced, and novice). Profile shapes were classified as U-shaped/concave (rip) or W-shaped/convex (crosscut) by each observer for all 150 cuts. Reliability tests using Cohen’s kappa ranged from substantial in the two less experienced observers to almost perfect in pairwise comparisons with the expert. Microscopic classification accuracy was 94.0% (423/450) for all three observers and macroscopic examination increased accuracy to 99.8% (449/450). Saw wear and tooth size were not a significant determiner in correct identification of saw tooth type. Overall, tooth shape can be reliably and accurately determined from incomplete cuts.
基于刻痕底板轮廓细观与宏观分析的手锯齿形识别
骨骼创伤分析是法医人类学案件工作的一个主要方面,可以解释锋利的力锯创伤。手动锯通常用于肢解和分析需要区分类别特征的情况。切口壁和地板的特征提供了用于识别工具的设置、形状、大小、功率和锯切运动方向的信息。本研究的重点是检验从切口地板特征确定齿形类别特征(撕裂与横切)的有效性和可靠性。两台横切手锯和三台撕裂手锯,每英寸从6到16齿不等,每锯30次不完整切割,总共切割150次。使用30倍放大镜,由3名不同经验水平的观察者(专家、有经验者和新手)对每个切口地板进行宏观和微观分析。对于所有150个切口,每个观察者将剖面形状分类为u形/凹形(撕裂)或w形/凸形(横切)。使用科恩卡帕法进行的信度测试,从两个经验不足的观察者的相当程度,到与专家的两两比较几乎完美。三个观察者的显微分类准确率为94.0%(423/450),宏观检查的准确率提高到99.8%(449/450)。锯片磨损和锯片尺寸在正确识别锯片类型方面不是显著的决定因素。总的来说,可以可靠和准确地从不完整的切割确定齿形。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信