The potential of serum copeptin as a prognostic marker of mortality in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock

S. Assaad, M. S. Abd El Salam, T. Elsherbiny, Neveen L Mikhael, Mohammad M. Farghly
{"title":"The potential of serum copeptin as a prognostic marker of mortality in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, or septic shock","authors":"S. Assaad, M. S. Abd El Salam, T. Elsherbiny, Neveen L Mikhael, Mohammad M. Farghly","doi":"10.4103/2356-8062.200907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The present study sought to investigate the correlation of copeptin with the severity of septic status and to analyze the usefulness of copeptin as a predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Patients and methods This prospective observational study was conducted in Alexandria Main University Hospital. The participants were 60 patients who had sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock consecutively admitted to the internal medicine ward and the ICU from October 2014 to August 2015. All patients were subjected to full history taking, clinical examination, as well as routine laboratory workup including serum Na+, serum K+, and serum lactate and imaging parameters. Serum copeptin was measured on the first or second day of admission. APACHE II scores were assigned on the basis of the most pessimistic clinical and laboratory data obtained during the first 24 h following admission. Patients were followed up for 10 days after admission, and the 10-day mortality rate was calculated. In addition, 20 age-matched and sex-matched healthy participants were enrolled as controls. Results Measured serum copeptin was significantly increased in groups I, II, and III in comparison with the control group (P<0.001). The value was increasing from sepsis to severe sepsis to septic shock. When patients were followed up for early mortality within 7–10 days, we found that the measured serum copeptin was higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors but without statistically significant difference. It was concluded according to the study of receiver operating characteristic curves that APACHE II score is more sensitive and specific than the serum copeptin when used as a prognostic tool to predict mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that serum copeptin levels increase progressively with the severity of sepsis and may be considered an independent predictor of mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock with superiority of APACHE II scoring.","PeriodicalId":260758,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Journal of Obesity, Diabetes and Endocrinology","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Journal of Obesity, Diabetes and Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/2356-8062.200907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background The present study sought to investigate the correlation of copeptin with the severity of septic status and to analyze the usefulness of copeptin as a predictor of mortality in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock. Patients and methods This prospective observational study was conducted in Alexandria Main University Hospital. The participants were 60 patients who had sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock consecutively admitted to the internal medicine ward and the ICU from October 2014 to August 2015. All patients were subjected to full history taking, clinical examination, as well as routine laboratory workup including serum Na+, serum K+, and serum lactate and imaging parameters. Serum copeptin was measured on the first or second day of admission. APACHE II scores were assigned on the basis of the most pessimistic clinical and laboratory data obtained during the first 24 h following admission. Patients were followed up for 10 days after admission, and the 10-day mortality rate was calculated. In addition, 20 age-matched and sex-matched healthy participants were enrolled as controls. Results Measured serum copeptin was significantly increased in groups I, II, and III in comparison with the control group (P<0.001). The value was increasing from sepsis to severe sepsis to septic shock. When patients were followed up for early mortality within 7–10 days, we found that the measured serum copeptin was higher in nonsurvivors than in survivors but without statistically significant difference. It was concluded according to the study of receiver operating characteristic curves that APACHE II score is more sensitive and specific than the serum copeptin when used as a prognostic tool to predict mortality in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Conclusion Our data demonstrate that serum copeptin levels increase progressively with the severity of sepsis and may be considered an independent predictor of mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock with superiority of APACHE II scoring.
血清copeptin作为脓毒症、严重脓毒症或感染性休克患者死亡率的预后标志物的潜力
本研究旨在探讨copeptin与脓毒症严重程度的相关性,并分析copeptin作为脓毒症、严重脓毒症和脓毒症休克患者死亡率预测因子的有效性。患者和方法本前瞻性观察研究在亚历山大大学附属医院进行。研究对象为2014年10月至2015年8月在内科病房和ICU连续收治的60例脓毒症、严重脓毒症和脓毒症休克患者。所有患者均接受了完整的病史、临床检查以及常规实验室检查,包括血清Na+、血清K+、血清乳酸和影像学参数。入院第1天或第2天测定血清copeptin。APACHE II评分基于入院后24小时内获得的最悲观的临床和实验室数据。入院后随访10 d,计算10 d死亡率。此外,20名年龄和性别匹配的健康参与者被纳入对照组。结果ⅰ组、ⅱ组和ⅲ组血清copeptin测量值较对照组显著升高(P<0.001)。从脓毒症到严重脓毒症再到脓毒症休克,该值逐渐升高。当患者在7-10天内随访早期死亡率时,我们发现非幸存者的血清copeptin高于幸存者,但无统计学差异。根据受试者工作特征曲线的研究,APACHE II评分比血清copeptin作为预测严重脓毒症和感染性休克患者死亡率的预后工具更敏感和特异性。结论血清copeptin水平随着脓毒症的严重程度逐渐升高,可作为严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克死亡率的独立预测指标,且APACHE II评分具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信