There’s just huge anxiety: ontological security, moral panic, and the decline in young people’s mental health and well-being in the UK

J. Bell, M. Reid, J. Dyson, A. Schlösser, T. Alexander
{"title":"There’s just huge anxiety: ontological security, moral panic, and the decline in young people’s mental health and well-being in the UK","authors":"J. Bell, M. Reid, J. Dyson, A. Schlösser, T. Alexander","doi":"10.4081/qrmh.2019.8200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to critically discuss factors associated with a recent dramatic rise in recorded mental health issues amongst UK youth. It draws from interviews and focus groups undertaken with young people, parents and professionals. We offer valuable new insights into significant issues affecting young people’s mental health and well-being that are grounded in their lived experiences and in those who care for and work with them. By means of a thematic analysis of the data, we identified an increase in anxiety related to: future orientation, social media use, education, austerity, and normalization of mental distress and self-harm. We apply the notion of ontological security in our interpretation of how socio-cultural and political changes have increased anxiety amongst young people and consequent uncertainty about the self, the world and the future, leading to mental health problems. There are also problems conceptualizing and managing adolescent mental health, including increased awareness, increased acceptance of these problems, and stigmatisation. We relate this to the tendency for moral panic and widespread dissemination of problems in a risk society. In our conclusion, we highlight implications for future research, policy and practice.","PeriodicalId":375726,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Medicine and Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/qrmh.2019.8200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study aims to critically discuss factors associated with a recent dramatic rise in recorded mental health issues amongst UK youth. It draws from interviews and focus groups undertaken with young people, parents and professionals. We offer valuable new insights into significant issues affecting young people’s mental health and well-being that are grounded in their lived experiences and in those who care for and work with them. By means of a thematic analysis of the data, we identified an increase in anxiety related to: future orientation, social media use, education, austerity, and normalization of mental distress and self-harm. We apply the notion of ontological security in our interpretation of how socio-cultural and political changes have increased anxiety amongst young people and consequent uncertainty about the self, the world and the future, leading to mental health problems. There are also problems conceptualizing and managing adolescent mental health, including increased awareness, increased acceptance of these problems, and stigmatisation. We relate this to the tendency for moral panic and widespread dissemination of problems in a risk society. In our conclusion, we highlight implications for future research, policy and practice.
存在着巨大的焦虑:本体论上的安全、道德上的恐慌,以及英国年轻人心理健康和幸福感的下降
本研究旨在批判性地讨论与英国青少年中记录的心理健康问题最近急剧上升相关的因素。它取材于对年轻人、父母和专业人士进行的访谈和焦点小组。我们对影响年轻人心理健康和福祉的重大问题提供了宝贵的新见解,这些问题基于他们的生活经历以及那些关心他们和与他们一起工作的人。通过对数据的专题分析,我们发现焦虑的增加与以下因素有关:未来取向、社交媒体使用、教育、紧缩以及精神痛苦和自残的正常化。我们运用本体论安全的概念来解释社会文化和政治变化如何增加年轻人的焦虑,以及随之而来的对自我、世界和未来的不确定性,从而导致心理健康问题。对青少年心理健康的概念化和管理也存在问题,包括提高对这些问题的认识、更多地接受这些问题以及污名化。我们将此与风险社会中道德恐慌和问题广泛传播的趋势联系起来。在我们的结论中,我们强调了对未来研究、政策和实践的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信