The Environmental Protection Agency's Budget from 1970 to 2010: A Lifecycle Analysis

Péter Bálint, James K. Conant
{"title":"The Environmental Protection Agency's Budget from 1970 to 2010: A Lifecycle Analysis","authors":"Péter Bálint, James K. Conant","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5850.2013.12023.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using three approaches, we attempt to explain changes in the Environmental Protection Agency's operating budget from 1970 to 2010. First, we compare qualitative predictions from two general types of agency lifecycle theories to the actual path of the EPA's budget. Second, we test empirically several hypotheses regarding the effects of political, economic, and other variables on the agency's budget. Third, we conduct detailed historical case studies of selected years. The results offer hints of support for theories predicting incremental change but do not support the hypothesized effects of external factors. We also uncover some historical anomalies that warrant further research.","PeriodicalId":378017,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Environment (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Environment (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5850.2013.12023.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Using three approaches, we attempt to explain changes in the Environmental Protection Agency's operating budget from 1970 to 2010. First, we compare qualitative predictions from two general types of agency lifecycle theories to the actual path of the EPA's budget. Second, we test empirically several hypotheses regarding the effects of political, economic, and other variables on the agency's budget. Third, we conduct detailed historical case studies of selected years. The results offer hints of support for theories predicting incremental change but do not support the hypothesized effects of external factors. We also uncover some historical anomalies that warrant further research.
环境保护署1970年至2010年的预算:生命周期分析
通过三种方法,我们试图解释1970年至2010年间环境保护署运营预算的变化。首先,我们将两种机构生命周期理论的定性预测与EPA预算的实际路径进行比较。其次,我们实证检验了几个关于政治、经济和其他变量对机构预算影响的假设。第三,我们对选定的年份进行详细的历史案例研究。研究结果为预测增量变化的理论提供了支持,但不支持外部因素的假设影响。我们还发现了一些值得进一步研究的历史异常现象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信