Internal versus External Employee Assistance Programs: What the Canadian Data Adds to the Debate

R. Csiernik
{"title":"Internal versus External Employee Assistance Programs: What the Canadian Data Adds to the Debate","authors":"R. Csiernik","doi":"10.1300/J022V15N02_01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the emergence of external Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) in the 1970's to challenge the ensconced internal model, there has been an ongoing debate over which method of service delivery is superior. Numerous assumptions have arisen about the various strengths and limitations of the two models though the empirical support for these beliefs remains relatively limited. In this article, 36 Canadian EAP studies are used as the basis to assess the suppositions surrounding internal and external EAPs.","PeriodicalId":246202,"journal":{"name":"Employee Assistance Quarterly","volume":"18 5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Employee Assistance Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/J022V15N02_01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Abstract Since the emergence of external Employee Assistance Programs (EAPs) in the 1970's to challenge the ensconced internal model, there has been an ongoing debate over which method of service delivery is superior. Numerous assumptions have arisen about the various strengths and limitations of the two models though the empirical support for these beliefs remains relatively limited. In this article, 36 Canadian EAP studies are used as the basis to assess the suppositions surrounding internal and external EAPs.
内部与外部员工援助计划:加拿大的数据增加了争论
自20世纪70年代外部员工援助计划(EAPs)出现以来,一直存在关于哪种服务提供方法更优越的争论。尽管对这些信念的经验支持仍然相对有限,但关于这两个模型的各种优势和局限性的许多假设已经出现。本文以36项加拿大EAP研究为基础,评估围绕内部和外部EAP的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信