Clinical evaluation of a portable pocket colposcope for cervical cancer screening in the United States, Perú, and Tanzania

Jenna L. Mueller, Christopher T Lam, M. Kellish, Jenna Peters, M. Asiedu, Marlee S. Krieger, Jennifer E. Gallagher, A. Erkanli, Ernesto J Ortiz, Lisa C. Muasher, Peyton Taylor, B. Mchome, O. Oneko, Gino Venegas, John W Schmitt, N. Ramanujam
{"title":"Clinical evaluation of a portable pocket colposcope for cervical cancer screening in the United States, Perú, and Tanzania","authors":"Jenna L. Mueller, Christopher T Lam, M. Kellish, Jenna Peters, M. Asiedu, Marlee S. Krieger, Jennifer E. Gallagher, A. Erkanli, Ernesto J Ortiz, Lisa C. Muasher, Peyton Taylor, B. Mchome, O. Oneko, Gino Venegas, John W Schmitt, N. Ramanujam","doi":"10.1109/HIC.2017.8227598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths for women worldwide, despite being both preventable and treatable if detected early enough. The burden of disease persists in part due to a lack of access to early diagnostics and the fact that a significant proportion of women do not return for follow-up care. To address this need, we developed a low-cost, portable Pocket colposcope that can be used in remote settings for cervical cancer screening and prevention. We evaluated whether the Pocket colposcope performs comparably to the standard-of-care colposcope in Durham, North Carolina, Lima, Perú, and Moshi, Tanzania. Concordant image pairs obtained from this device and the current standard imaging was sent to physician experts from high, middle, and low-income countries. They were blinded as to diagnosis, device, and peer response. Each image was critically evaluated for quality and presumptive findings and compared. Corresponding pathology was obtained for each patient. Physician interpretation agreed 76.8% of the time between the Pocket colposcope and standard-of-care colposcope. Physician interpretation agreed with pathology 59.4% and 63.0% for the Pocket and standard-of-care colposcopes, respectively. The primary outcome of this study was to show reasonable concordance between the Pocket colposcope and state of the art imaging in terms of individual examiners, pathologic diagnosis, and image quality. In all areas the Pocket colposcope showed comparable results to country-specific standard-of-care screening.","PeriodicalId":120815,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Healthcare Innovations and Point of Care Technologies (HI-POCT)","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Healthcare Innovations and Point of Care Technologies (HI-POCT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/HIC.2017.8227598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Cervical cancer is the second leading cause of cancer related deaths for women worldwide, despite being both preventable and treatable if detected early enough. The burden of disease persists in part due to a lack of access to early diagnostics and the fact that a significant proportion of women do not return for follow-up care. To address this need, we developed a low-cost, portable Pocket colposcope that can be used in remote settings for cervical cancer screening and prevention. We evaluated whether the Pocket colposcope performs comparably to the standard-of-care colposcope in Durham, North Carolina, Lima, Perú, and Moshi, Tanzania. Concordant image pairs obtained from this device and the current standard imaging was sent to physician experts from high, middle, and low-income countries. They were blinded as to diagnosis, device, and peer response. Each image was critically evaluated for quality and presumptive findings and compared. Corresponding pathology was obtained for each patient. Physician interpretation agreed 76.8% of the time between the Pocket colposcope and standard-of-care colposcope. Physician interpretation agreed with pathology 59.4% and 63.0% for the Pocket and standard-of-care colposcopes, respectively. The primary outcome of this study was to show reasonable concordance between the Pocket colposcope and state of the art imaging in terms of individual examiners, pathologic diagnosis, and image quality. In all areas the Pocket colposcope showed comparable results to country-specific standard-of-care screening.
美国、Perú和坦桑尼亚用于宫颈癌筛查的便携式口袋阴道镜的临床评价
子宫颈癌是全世界妇女癌症相关死亡的第二大原因,尽管如果发现得足够早,它既可以预防,也可以治疗。疾病负担持续存在的部分原因是无法获得早期诊断,而且很大一部分妇女没有返回接受后续护理。为了满足这一需求,我们开发了一种低成本的便携式口袋阴道镜,可以在偏远地区用于宫颈癌筛查和预防。我们评估了Pocket阴道镜是否与Durham, North Carolina, Lima, Perú和Moshi, Tanzania的标准护理阴道镜相比较。从该设备获得的与现行标准成像一致的图像对被发送给来自高、中、低收入国家的医师专家。他们对诊断、设备和同伴反应一无所知。每张图像的质量和推定结果进行了严格的评估和比较。对每位患者进行相应的病理检查。医师解释在口袋阴道镜和标准护理阴道镜之间的一致性为76.8%。Pocket阴道镜和标准护理阴道镜的医师解释与病理的一致性分别为59.4%和63.0%。本研究的主要结果是在个体检查、病理诊断和图像质量方面显示口袋阴道镜与最先进的成像技术之间的合理一致性。在所有地区,口袋阴道镜显示出与国家特定标准护理筛查相当的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信