Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Decentralization in Blockchain Governance: Commentary on ‘Two Sides of the Same Coin? Decentralized Versus Proprietary Blockchains and the Performance of Digital Currencies’ by Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer

Hanna Halaburda, Christoph Mueller-Bloch
{"title":"Toward a Multidimensional Conceptualization of Decentralization in Blockchain Governance: Commentary on ‘Two Sides of the Same Coin? Decentralized Versus Proprietary Blockchains and the Performance of Digital Currencies’ by Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer","authors":"Hanna Halaburda, Christoph Mueller-Bloch","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3746182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this commentary, we argue that studies similar to Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer (2020) should distinguish four dimensions of control in blockchain governance, all of which could be more or less decentralized. For some of these dimensions, decentralization is likely beneficial, while for others centralization may be preferable. Cennamo et al. (2020) provide evidence that the initial design stages of blockchain systems benefit from centralization. Future research is needed to provide empirical insights for other dimensions of control in blockchain governance.","PeriodicalId":105736,"journal":{"name":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","volume":"36 3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organizations & Markets: Policies & Processes eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3746182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this commentary, we argue that studies similar to Cennamo, Marchesi, and Meyer (2020) should distinguish four dimensions of control in blockchain governance, all of which could be more or less decentralized. For some of these dimensions, decentralization is likely beneficial, while for others centralization may be preferable. Cennamo et al. (2020) provide evidence that the initial design stages of blockchain systems benefit from centralization. Future research is needed to provide empirical insights for other dimensions of control in blockchain governance.
区块链治理中去中心化的多维概念化:评论“同一枚硬币的两面?”去中心化的区块链与专有的区块链以及数字货币的表现,作者:Cennamo, Marchesi和Meyer
在这篇评论中,我们认为类似于Cennamo、Marchesi和Meyer(2020)的研究应该区分区块链治理中的四个控制维度,所有这些维度都可能或多或少地去中心化。对于其中一些方面,去中心化可能是有益的,而对于其他方面,集中化可能是可取的。Cennamo等人(2020)提供的证据表明,区块链系统的初始设计阶段受益于中心化。未来的研究需要为区块链治理中的其他控制维度提供实证见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信