St’andart’uli ena da kartuli enis ortograpiuli leksik’onebi /სტანდარტული ენა და ქართული ენის ორთოგრაფიული ლექსიკონები [Standard Language and Orthographic Dictionaries of Georgian Language]

Rusudan Saghinadze
{"title":"St’andart’uli ena da kartuli enis ortograpiuli leksik’onebi /სტანდარტული ენა და ქართული ენის ორთოგრაფიული ლექსიკონები [Standard Language and Orthographic Dictionaries of Georgian Language]","authors":"Rusudan Saghinadze","doi":"10.54635/tpks.2022.14putk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines two main factors causing modern language disorders\nin modern Georgian written and spoken language, such as: A. Contradiction\nbetween the norms of the modern Georgian literary language and living speech;\nB. Contradiction in the norms of the modern Georgian literary language itself.\nWe aim to show the contradictory situation caused by these two factors in\nthe resources that should be used to maintain the standard of this or that word\nform. We mean orthographic dictionaries of the Georgian language, including\nsuch a fundamental dictionary as V. Topuria and Iv. Gigineishvili’s “orthographic\ndictionary of the Georgian language” (1968; 1998), as well as electronic dictionaries\nand other publications (collections). In the lexical material, the qualitative\ndifference in the standard language resources makes some norms controversial,\nwhich contributes to the emergence of language form variants, incorrect forms\nnext to the correct ones, and, moreover, hinders the updating of the norm, and the\ndevelopment of a new linguistic standard. This problem became even more acute\nwhen the project of a young specialist, data scientist and programmer Vakhtang\nElerdashvili called “Incorrect-Print-Finder” – a morphological checker of errors in\nthe text – appeared on the social network (Facebook). The aim of the project is to\ncreate a perfect text analyzer in Georgian.\nThe paper analyzes the relevant material reflecting the contradictory\nsituation in the standard language resources, outlines the ways to solve the\nproblem, concludes that the material in the standard language resources should be\nunited (processed) and a united orthographic database, an extensive orthographic\nelectronic dictionary with the function of constantly updating the norms of the\nGeorgian literary language should be created.\nსაკვანძო სიტყვები: სალიტერატურო ენა, ნორმა, ენობრივი წინააღმდეგობა.\nKeywords: literary language,, norm, linguistic contradiction.","PeriodicalId":272679,"journal":{"name":"Kartveluri Memk'vidreoba [Kartvelian Heritage]","volume":"173 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kartveluri Memk'vidreoba [Kartvelian Heritage]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54635/tpks.2022.14putk","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines two main factors causing modern language disorders in modern Georgian written and spoken language, such as: A. Contradiction between the norms of the modern Georgian literary language and living speech; B. Contradiction in the norms of the modern Georgian literary language itself. We aim to show the contradictory situation caused by these two factors in the resources that should be used to maintain the standard of this or that word form. We mean orthographic dictionaries of the Georgian language, including such a fundamental dictionary as V. Topuria and Iv. Gigineishvili’s “orthographic dictionary of the Georgian language” (1968; 1998), as well as electronic dictionaries and other publications (collections). In the lexical material, the qualitative difference in the standard language resources makes some norms controversial, which contributes to the emergence of language form variants, incorrect forms next to the correct ones, and, moreover, hinders the updating of the norm, and the development of a new linguistic standard. This problem became even more acute when the project of a young specialist, data scientist and programmer Vakhtang Elerdashvili called “Incorrect-Print-Finder” – a morphological checker of errors in the text – appeared on the social network (Facebook). The aim of the project is to create a perfect text analyzer in Georgian. The paper analyzes the relevant material reflecting the contradictory situation in the standard language resources, outlines the ways to solve the problem, concludes that the material in the standard language resources should be united (processed) and a united orthographic database, an extensive orthographic electronic dictionary with the function of constantly updating the norms of the Georgian literary language should be created. საკვანძო სიტყვები: სალიტერატურო ენა, ნორმა, ენობრივი წინააღმდეგობა. Keywords: literary language,, norm, linguistic contradiction.
文章探讨了导致现代格鲁吉亚书面语和口语出现现代语言障碍的两个主要因素,即:现代格鲁吉亚文学语言规范与生活语言规范之间的矛盾;矛盾在于现代格鲁吉亚文学语言本身的规范。我们的目的是展示这两种因素造成的矛盾局面,在资源中应该用来维持这个或那个词的标准。我们指的是格鲁吉亚语的正字法词典,包括像托普里亚和吉涅什维利的《格鲁吉亚语正字法词典》(1968;1998),以及电子词典和其他出版物(集)。在词汇材料中,标准语言资源的质的差异使一些规范产生了争议,导致语言形式变体的出现,正确的形式旁边出现了不正确的形式,并且阻碍了规范的更新和新的语言标准的发展。当年轻的专家、数据科学家和程序员VakhtangElerdashvili的一个名为“Incorrect-Print-Finder”的项目出现在社交网络(Facebook)上时,这个问题变得更加严重。这个项目是一个文本错误的词形检查器。该项目的目的是创建一个完美的格鲁吉亚文本分析器。分析了标准语言资源中反映出矛盾状况的相关资料,提出了解决问题的途径,认为应统一(处理)标准语言资源中的资料,建立统一的正字法数据库,创建具有不断更新格鲁吉亚文学语言规范功能的综合性正字法电子词典。საკვანძოსიტყვები:სალიტერატუროენა,ნორმა,ენობრივიწინააღმდეგობა。关键词:文学语言,规范,语言矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信