Validation of Rash and Nonspecific Eruption Diagnoses Using ICD-9 and ICD-10 Codes

M. Goldenberg, M. Amigo, S. Krishna, N. Milani-Nejad, J. Trinidad, B. Kaffenberger
{"title":"Validation of Rash and Nonspecific Eruption Diagnoses Using ICD-9 and ICD-10 Codes","authors":"M. Goldenberg, M. Amigo, S. Krishna, N. Milani-Nejad, J. Trinidad, B. Kaffenberger","doi":"10.18061/ad.v1i1.8860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite being common cutaneous findings in the hospital setting, cutaneous drug eruptions have not been thoroughly validated for administrative claims data. The purpose of this study was to validate primary discharge diagnoses for the ICD code rash or other nonspecific eruptions by finding the positive predictive value (PPV) and to determine how often it was used to indicate an eruption that was eventually determined to be a drug eruption. Two dermatologists independently examined each of 39 hospital patient encounters to assess the validity of the ICD code used by stating whether the code used was appropriate or inappropriate, per table 1 criteria. Since in most patients, a drug eruption was suspected, the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale was utilized to externally validate our findings. Our results yielded a PPV for nonspecific rashes of 94.87% (83.11-98.58%) for appropriateness of use. The mean Naranjo score for appropriately versus inappropriately coded cases was 5.7 versus 2.5, respectively, with a mean difference of 3.17568 (0.18833-6.16302), (pooled P-value = 0.0378). Out of the cases analyzed, 29/39 or 74% were confirmed to be drug-related. Our high PPV supports the validity of non-specific eruptions found in national patient databases and the high Naranjo criteria suggest that often, these eruptions are drug related, yet not confirmed at the point of discharge.","PeriodicalId":376900,"journal":{"name":"Academic Dermatology","volume":"215 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18061/ad.v1i1.8860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite being common cutaneous findings in the hospital setting, cutaneous drug eruptions have not been thoroughly validated for administrative claims data. The purpose of this study was to validate primary discharge diagnoses for the ICD code rash or other nonspecific eruptions by finding the positive predictive value (PPV) and to determine how often it was used to indicate an eruption that was eventually determined to be a drug eruption. Two dermatologists independently examined each of 39 hospital patient encounters to assess the validity of the ICD code used by stating whether the code used was appropriate or inappropriate, per table 1 criteria. Since in most patients, a drug eruption was suspected, the Naranjo Adverse Drug Reaction Probability Scale was utilized to externally validate our findings. Our results yielded a PPV for nonspecific rashes of 94.87% (83.11-98.58%) for appropriateness of use. The mean Naranjo score for appropriately versus inappropriately coded cases was 5.7 versus 2.5, respectively, with a mean difference of 3.17568 (0.18833-6.16302), (pooled P-value = 0.0378). Out of the cases analyzed, 29/39 or 74% were confirmed to be drug-related. Our high PPV supports the validity of non-specific eruptions found in national patient databases and the high Naranjo criteria suggest that often, these eruptions are drug related, yet not confirmed at the point of discharge.
使用ICD-9和ICD-10代码验证皮疹和非特异性皮疹诊断
尽管在医院环境中常见的皮肤发现,皮肤药疹尚未被彻底验证行政索赔数据。本研究的目的是通过寻找阳性预测值(PPV)来验证ICD代码皮疹或其他非特异性皮疹的初步出院诊断,并确定其用于指示最终确定为药疹的爆发的频率。根据表1的标准,两名皮肤科医生独立检查了39名医院患者的就诊情况,通过说明所使用的代码是适当的还是不适当的,来评估所使用ICD代码的有效性。由于在大多数患者中,怀疑药疹,因此使用Naranjo药物不良反应概率量表从外部验证我们的发现。我们的研究结果显示,非特异性皮疹使用的PPV为94.87%(83.11-98.58%)。适当编码与不适当编码病例的平均Naranjo评分分别为5.7和2.5,平均差异为3.17568(0.18833-6.16302),(合并p值= 0.0378)。在分析的病例中,有29/39或74%被证实与药物有关。我们的高PPV支持在国家患者数据库中发现的非特异性爆发的有效性,高纳兰霍标准表明,这些爆发通常与药物有关,但在出院时未得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信