Swinging between responsibility and rationality – Science policy and technology visions in India

Poonam Pandey, Aviram Sharma
{"title":"Swinging between responsibility and rationality – Science policy and technology visions in India","authors":"Poonam Pandey, Aviram Sharma","doi":"10.5771/9783748907275-155","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent debates on normativity in Technology Assessment (Delvenne et al. 2019; Grunwald 1999), a major emerging argument relates to the idea that TA is inherently normative and should embrace normative aspects, rather than aim for an unrealistic neutrality (Delvenne/Parotte 2019; Lucivero et al. 2019). Because of the aims it tries to achieve and the methods it employs, this implies in practice that TA is already acting on normative principles, such as the commitment to democratic values and the inclusion of diverse perspectives (Grunwald 2019; Hennen/Nierling 2019). The need of the hour, accordingly, is to be reflexive about these normativities to better utilize them for effective and more impactful policy-making (Delvenne et al. 2019). Another major discussion within the TA community is about the effectiveness of these values in engaging with the challenges of contemporary world. A lot has been said about contested values such as neutrality and inclusion in the context of western countries (Hennen/Nierling 2019). Challenges become even more prominent in the context of the global south, where multiple knowledge systems coexist and cultural diversity is accompanied by social inequality and informality. However, in these countries, TA as a part of the formal mechanism to engage with technology and society remains hugely understudied from a critical point of view. Either formal TA is not employed in global south settings at all or it is directly transported from the west and super-imposed as a prefixed model. Thus, a situated, contextspecific and critical analysis of values employed through TA approaches in the global south is necessary. In this paper, we will critically engage with normative aspects as employed in TA in the Indian context. Are there values that remain hidden and get neglected? How do dominant norms create or deter a space for more pluralistic decision-making? How do the dominant values promoted at the theoretical level become implemented in real situations? As a heuristic tool, we will discuss values circulated through the ideals of rationality and responsibility in TA debates in India. A detailed discussion on rationality and 1","PeriodicalId":141375,"journal":{"name":"Die neutrale Normativität der Technikfolgenabschätzung","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die neutrale Normativität der Technikfolgenabschätzung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748907275-155","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent debates on normativity in Technology Assessment (Delvenne et al. 2019; Grunwald 1999), a major emerging argument relates to the idea that TA is inherently normative and should embrace normative aspects, rather than aim for an unrealistic neutrality (Delvenne/Parotte 2019; Lucivero et al. 2019). Because of the aims it tries to achieve and the methods it employs, this implies in practice that TA is already acting on normative principles, such as the commitment to democratic values and the inclusion of diverse perspectives (Grunwald 2019; Hennen/Nierling 2019). The need of the hour, accordingly, is to be reflexive about these normativities to better utilize them for effective and more impactful policy-making (Delvenne et al. 2019). Another major discussion within the TA community is about the effectiveness of these values in engaging with the challenges of contemporary world. A lot has been said about contested values such as neutrality and inclusion in the context of western countries (Hennen/Nierling 2019). Challenges become even more prominent in the context of the global south, where multiple knowledge systems coexist and cultural diversity is accompanied by social inequality and informality. However, in these countries, TA as a part of the formal mechanism to engage with technology and society remains hugely understudied from a critical point of view. Either formal TA is not employed in global south settings at all or it is directly transported from the west and super-imposed as a prefixed model. Thus, a situated, contextspecific and critical analysis of values employed through TA approaches in the global south is necessary. In this paper, we will critically engage with normative aspects as employed in TA in the Indian context. Are there values that remain hidden and get neglected? How do dominant norms create or deter a space for more pluralistic decision-making? How do the dominant values promoted at the theoretical level become implemented in real situations? As a heuristic tool, we will discuss values circulated through the ideals of rationality and responsibility in TA debates in India. A detailed discussion on rationality and 1
在责任和理性之间摇摆——印度的科学政策和技术愿景
在最近关于技术评估规范性的辩论中(Delvenne et al. 2019;Grunwald 1999),一个主要的新兴论点涉及到TA本质上是规范性的,应该包含规范性方面,而不是以不切实际的中立为目标(Delvenne/Parotte 2019;Lucivero et al. 2019)。由于它试图实现的目标和它采用的方法,这意味着在实践中,TA已经按照规范原则行事,例如对民主价值观的承诺和对不同观点的包容(Grunwald 2019;Hennen / Nierling 2019)。因此,时间的需要是对这些规范进行反思,以更好地利用它们进行有效和更有影响力的决策(Delvenne et al. 2019)。助教社区的另一个主要讨论是这些价值观在应对当代世界挑战方面的有效性。关于西方国家背景下的中立和包容等有争议的价值观,人们说了很多(Hennen/Nierling 2019)。在多种知识体系并存、文化多样性伴随着社会不平等和不正之风的全球南方背景下,挑战变得更加突出。然而,在这些国家,从批判的角度来看,技术培训作为与技术和社会接触的正式机制的一部分仍未得到充分研究。在全球南方环境中,要么完全不采用正式的TA,要么直接从西方引进TA,并作为一个前缀模型叠加在一起。因此,有必要对全球南方国家通过技术援助方法所采用的价值观进行情境性、具体背景性和批判性的分析。在本文中,我们将批判性地参与印度背景下TA所采用的规范方面。是否存在隐藏和被忽视的价值?主导规范如何创造或阻碍更多元化决策的空间?在理论层面提倡的主导价值观如何在实际情况中得到实施?作为一种启发式工具,我们将讨论在印度TA辩论中通过理性和责任理想传播的价值观。详细论述了理性与1
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信