Permanencia y abandono de estudios en estudiantes universitarios: un análisis desde la teoría organizacional

Q3 Social Sciences
Gonzalo Fonseca, Fernando García
{"title":"Permanencia y abandono de estudios en estudiantes universitarios: un análisis desde la teoría organizacional","authors":"Gonzalo Fonseca,&nbsp;Fernando García","doi":"10.1016/j.resu.2016.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Using an organizational perspective, the following article analyzes four mainstream theoretical models regarding permanence and dropout rates among university students. The analysis was based on a review of documents from primary sources, institutional databases and Google Scholar. In conducting the analysis, the documents were divided into three categories: explanatory theories regarding permanence and dropout rates among university students (1975-1991), contemporary research on the topic (2005-2015), and studies of the impact of institutional factors on students (2004-2011). The analysis revealed an insufficient inclusion of pedagogical variables and a limited number of mixed research methods employed in analyzing a phenomenon as complex as permanence and dropout rates among university students.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37807,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Educacion Superior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.resu.2016.06.004","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Educacion Superior","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0185276016300450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

Using an organizational perspective, the following article analyzes four mainstream theoretical models regarding permanence and dropout rates among university students. The analysis was based on a review of documents from primary sources, institutional databases and Google Scholar. In conducting the analysis, the documents were divided into three categories: explanatory theories regarding permanence and dropout rates among university students (1975-1991), contemporary research on the topic (2005-2015), and studies of the impact of institutional factors on students (2004-2011). The analysis revealed an insufficient inclusion of pedagogical variables and a limited number of mixed research methods employed in analyzing a phenomenon as complex as permanence and dropout rates among university students.

大学生的留校与退学:组织理论的分析
本文从组织的角度分析了四种主流的关于大学生持久性和辍学率的理论模型。该分析是基于对主要来源、机构数据库和谷歌学术(Google Scholar)的文件的审查。在进行分析时,这些文件被分为三类:关于大学生持久和辍学率的解释理论(1975-1991),该主题的当代研究(2005-2015),以及制度因素对学生影响的研究(2004-2011)。分析表明,在分析像大学生的持久性和辍学率这样复杂的现象时,没有充分纳入教学变量,并且使用的混合研究方法数量有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de la Educacion Superior
Revista de la Educacion Superior Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: La Revista de la Educación Superior (RESU) es un medio que se propone publicar textos académicos originales sobre la educación superior mexicana, con apertura a la dimensión internacional. Sus destinatarios son tanto investigadores que trabajan temas de educación superior como directivos, especialistas e interesados en planeación, evaluación y gestión de las instituciones y sistemas de educación superior. Por consiguiente, se difunden artículos de investigación, ensayos académicos y reseñas críticas, que propicien que los lectores enriquezcan su bagaje conceptual y analítico, y amplíen su conocimiento acerca de los retos que enfrentan los sistemas e instituciones de educación superior en los entornos nacional e internacional.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信