Meta-QoS performance of earliest-deadline-first and rate-monotonic scheduling of smoothed video data in a client-server environment

K. Tsoi, Yu-Kwong Kwok
{"title":"Meta-QoS performance of earliest-deadline-first and rate-monotonic scheduling of smoothed video data in a client-server environment","authors":"K. Tsoi, Yu-Kwong Kwok","doi":"10.1109/ISPAN.1999.778948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper we present an extensive performance study of two modified EDF and RM scheduling algorithms which are enhanced to provide quality of service (QoS) guarantees for smoothed video data. With a probabilistic definition of QoS, we incorporate admission control conditions into the two algorithms. Furthermore, we also include a counter-based scheduling module as the core scheduling mechanism which adaptively adjusts the actual QoS levels assigned to requests. Our theoretical analysis of the two enhanced algorithms, called QEDF and QRM, shows that the QRM algorithm is more robust than the QEDF algorithm for different workload and utilization conditions. We also propose to use a new metric called meta-QoS to quantify the overall performance of a packet scheduler given a set of simultaneous requests. In our experiments, we find that the QRM algorithm can sustain a rather stable level of meta-QoS even when the workload and utilization levels are increased. On the other hand, the QEDF algorithm is found to be less desirable for a high level of utilization and a large number of requests.","PeriodicalId":157641,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Fourth International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (I-SPAN'99)","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Fourth International Symposium on Parallel Architectures, Algorithms, and Networks (I-SPAN'99)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISPAN.1999.778948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In this paper we present an extensive performance study of two modified EDF and RM scheduling algorithms which are enhanced to provide quality of service (QoS) guarantees for smoothed video data. With a probabilistic definition of QoS, we incorporate admission control conditions into the two algorithms. Furthermore, we also include a counter-based scheduling module as the core scheduling mechanism which adaptively adjusts the actual QoS levels assigned to requests. Our theoretical analysis of the two enhanced algorithms, called QEDF and QRM, shows that the QRM algorithm is more robust than the QEDF algorithm for different workload and utilization conditions. We also propose to use a new metric called meta-QoS to quantify the overall performance of a packet scheduler given a set of simultaneous requests. In our experiments, we find that the QRM algorithm can sustain a rather stable level of meta-QoS even when the workload and utilization levels are increased. On the other hand, the QEDF algorithm is found to be less desirable for a high level of utilization and a large number of requests.
客户端-服务器环境下平滑视频数据的最早截止日期优先和速率单调调度的元qos性能
在本文中,我们对两种改进的EDF和RM调度算法进行了广泛的性能研究,这两种算法被增强以提供平滑视频数据的服务质量(QoS)保证。通过对QoS的概率定义,我们将准入控制条件纳入到这两种算法中。此外,我们还包括一个基于计数器的调度模块作为核心调度机制,该机制自适应地调整分配给请求的实际QoS级别。对QEDF和QRM两种增强算法的理论分析表明,在不同的工作负载和利用条件下,QRM算法比QEDF算法具有更强的鲁棒性。我们还建议使用一种称为元qos的新度量来量化给定一组同步请求的数据包调度器的总体性能。在我们的实验中,我们发现即使在工作负载和利用率水平增加的情况下,QRM算法也能保持相当稳定的元qos水平。另一方面,对于高利用率和大量请求来说,QEDF算法不太理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书