Comparison of Chinese 50 ETF put option pricing based on four algorithms

Bei Lin, Ze Dong Yun, Valklyrs Ye
{"title":"Comparison of Chinese 50 ETF put option pricing based on four algorithms","authors":"Bei Lin, Ze Dong Yun, Valklyrs Ye","doi":"10.1145/3481127.3481246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article starts with the traditional Black-Scholes(B-S) option pricing models. Three more models: Long-term and short-term memory networks(LSTM), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest(RF) are introduced to be compared to the B-S model and to each other on 50 ETF put option pricing. It is showed that each model has its advantages when used in different position. The neural network pricing result is better than that of the B-S model From the four evaluation indicators of MD, MSD, MAD and MPD, the absolute values of the four errors of the prediction results of the neural network are all smaller than the absolute values of the corresponding errors of the prediction results of the B-S model.","PeriodicalId":115326,"journal":{"name":"The 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The 2021 12th International Conference on E-business, Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3481127.3481246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article starts with the traditional Black-Scholes(B-S) option pricing models. Three more models: Long-term and short-term memory networks(LSTM), support vector machine (SVM) and random forest(RF) are introduced to be compared to the B-S model and to each other on 50 ETF put option pricing. It is showed that each model has its advantages when used in different position. The neural network pricing result is better than that of the B-S model From the four evaluation indicators of MD, MSD, MAD and MPD, the absolute values of the four errors of the prediction results of the neural network are all smaller than the absolute values of the corresponding errors of the prediction results of the B-S model.
基于四种算法的中国50只ETF看跌期权定价比较
本文从传统的Black-Scholes(B-S)期权定价模型入手。本文介绍了长短期记忆网络(LSTM)、支持向量机(SVM)和随机森林(RF)三种模型,并将其与B-S模型进行比较,并在50只ETF看跌期权定价中相互比较。结果表明,每种模型在不同的位置使用时都有其优点。从MD、MSD、MAD、MPD四个评价指标来看,神经网络预测结果的四个误差绝对值均小于B-S模型预测结果的相应误差绝对值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信