Mirror of Bleak House

Carolyn Vellenga Berman
{"title":"Mirror of Bleak House","authors":"Carolyn Vellenga Berman","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192845405.003.0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter highlights the satirical realism of Bleak House (1852–3) and traces the novel’s profound engagement with the Parliamentary Papers. After just seven numbers of Bleak House had appeared, the retired Lord Chief Justice Denman attacked Dickens for a belated show of reform, comparing his work unfavorably to the bestselling Uncle Tom’s Cabin. This chapter argues that Dickens attacked the Court of Chancery too late precisely to draw attention to the long period of time it had taken Parliament to reform Chancery. It reads Dickens’s critique of Chancery (and indirectly of the House of Lords) in light of the burning and rebuilding of the Houses of Parliament. It buttresses this case by reading Dickens’s “A Haunted House,” a sketch of the 1852 election. It argues that Bleak House holds out an unflattering mirror of Parliament, exposing its possibly constitutional failure, and finds the novel infused with traces of slavery and the slave trade as marks of British national shame.","PeriodicalId":197214,"journal":{"name":"Dickens and Democracy in the Age of Paper","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dickens and Democracy in the Age of Paper","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845405.003.0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter highlights the satirical realism of Bleak House (1852–3) and traces the novel’s profound engagement with the Parliamentary Papers. After just seven numbers of Bleak House had appeared, the retired Lord Chief Justice Denman attacked Dickens for a belated show of reform, comparing his work unfavorably to the bestselling Uncle Tom’s Cabin. This chapter argues that Dickens attacked the Court of Chancery too late precisely to draw attention to the long period of time it had taken Parliament to reform Chancery. It reads Dickens’s critique of Chancery (and indirectly of the House of Lords) in light of the burning and rebuilding of the Houses of Parliament. It buttresses this case by reading Dickens’s “A Haunted House,” a sketch of the 1852 election. It argues that Bleak House holds out an unflattering mirror of Parliament, exposing its possibly constitutional failure, and finds the novel infused with traces of slavery and the slave trade as marks of British national shame.
荒凉山庄之镜
这一章强调了《荒凉山庄》(1852 - 1853)的讽刺现实主义,并追溯了小说与议会文件的深刻联系。《荒凉山庄》刚出版七期,退休的首席大法官丹曼就抨击狄更斯姗姗来迟的改革,将他的作品与畅销书《汤姆叔叔的小屋》相提并论。本章认为,狄更斯攻击衡平法院的时机太迟,不足以引起人们对议会改革衡平法院所花费的漫长时间的注意。它从议会大厦的燃烧和重建的角度来解读狄更斯对大法官制度(间接地对上议院)的批判。通过阅读狄更斯的《鬼屋》(A Haunted House)来支持这一观点,这是对1852年大选的素描。它认为,荒凉山庄是议会的一面不讨人喜欢的镜子,暴露了它可能在宪法上的失败,并发现小说中充满了奴隶制和奴隶贸易的痕迹,这是英国民族耻辱的标志。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信