Exploring the Knowledge Structure of Creativity and Career Research: A Keyword Network Analysis

Donggun An
{"title":"Exploring the Knowledge Structure of Creativity and Career Research: A Keyword Network Analysis","authors":"Donggun An","doi":"10.36358/jce.2022.22.2.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to analyze the research trunds of creative career development studies and suggest a future direction for the studies by exploring the knowledge structure of creativity and career research. A total of 494 keywords were selected from 2211 research papers conducted in South Korea during the past 20 years from 2002 to 2021 that simultaneously considered creativity and career. Then, a network analysis including centrality and community analysis. Results showed that the keywords with high degree centralicy were cretivity, job satisfaction, job crafting, job outcomes, creative behavior, and so on. \nThe keywords with high betweenness centrality were creativity, job satisfaction, job crafting, college students, creative characteristics, and so on. In the results of community analysis, five subgroups were formed focusing on mathematics creativity (isolated node), creative problem solving (elementary students, career development, career resilience etc.), creativity (college students, creative characteristics, career maturicy, career preparation behavior etc.), early childhood teachers (job stress, teaching creativity, teaching efficacy etc.), and job satisfaction (job outcomes, job crafting, creative behavior, job engagement etc.), respevtively. \nThere were differences in research subjects, creativity forms, and career development factors that each subgroup was dealing with, and these differences provide importang implications for exploring the direction of creative career development studies according to the characteristics of individial subgroups. Theoretical and practical implications and future directions were discussed.","PeriodicalId":186018,"journal":{"name":"Korean Society for Creativity Education","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Society for Creativity Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36358/jce.2022.22.2.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the research trunds of creative career development studies and suggest a future direction for the studies by exploring the knowledge structure of creativity and career research. A total of 494 keywords were selected from 2211 research papers conducted in South Korea during the past 20 years from 2002 to 2021 that simultaneously considered creativity and career. Then, a network analysis including centrality and community analysis. Results showed that the keywords with high degree centralicy were cretivity, job satisfaction, job crafting, job outcomes, creative behavior, and so on. The keywords with high betweenness centrality were creativity, job satisfaction, job crafting, college students, creative characteristics, and so on. In the results of community analysis, five subgroups were formed focusing on mathematics creativity (isolated node), creative problem solving (elementary students, career development, career resilience etc.), creativity (college students, creative characteristics, career maturicy, career preparation behavior etc.), early childhood teachers (job stress, teaching creativity, teaching efficacy etc.), and job satisfaction (job outcomes, job crafting, creative behavior, job engagement etc.), respevtively. There were differences in research subjects, creativity forms, and career development factors that each subgroup was dealing with, and these differences provide importang implications for exploring the direction of creative career development studies according to the characteristics of individial subgroups. Theoretical and practical implications and future directions were discussed.
创造力与职业研究的知识结构探索:一个关键词网络分析
本研究旨在透过探索创意与职涯研究的知识结构,分析创意职涯发展研究的研究趋势,并提出未来的研究方向。从2002年至2021年的20年间在韩国进行的2211篇同时考虑创造力和职业的研究论文中,共选出了494个关键词。然后,进行了网络分析,包括中心性分析和社区分析。结果发现,具有高度中心性的关键词有创造力、工作满意度、工作制作、工作成果、创造性行为等。中间性中心性较高的关键词有创造力、工作满意度、工作制作、大学生、创造性特征等。在社区分析结果中,以数学创造力(孤立节点)、创造性解决问题(小学生、职业发展、职业弹性等)、创造力(大学生、创造性特征、职业成熟度、职业准备行为等)、幼儿教师(工作压力、教学创造力、教学效能等)和工作满意度(工作成果、工作制作、创造性行为、工作投入等)为重点,形成了5个小组。respevtively。各亚群在研究对象、创造力形式、职业发展因素等方面存在差异,这些差异为根据个体亚群的特点探索创造性职业发展研究的方向提供了重要启示。讨论了理论和实践意义及未来发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信